From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
npiggin@suse.de, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] vfs: Unmap underlying metadata of new data buffers only when buffer is mapped
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 15:45:54 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090528101554.GB27978@skywalker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090528094434.GG29199@duck.suse.cz>
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:44:34AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 27-05-09 21:05:59, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 03:01:05PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > When we do delayed allocation of some buffer, we want to signal to VFS that
> > > the buffer is new (set buffer_new) so that it properly zeros out everything.
> > > But we don't have the buffer mapped yet so we cannot really unmap underlying
> > > metadata in this state. Make VFS avoid doing unmapping of metadata when the
> > > buffer is not yet mapped.
> > >
> ...
> > > @@ -2683,7 +2685,7 @@ int nobh_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
> > > goto failed;
> > > if (!buffer_mapped(bh))
> > > is_mapped_to_disk = 0;
> > > - if (buffer_new(bh))
> > > + if (buffer_new(bh) && buffer_mapped(bh))
> > > unmap_underlying_metadata(bh->b_bdev, bh->b_blocknr);
> > > if (PageUptodate(page)) {
> > > set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
> >
> > Both xfs and ext4 return mapped delay buffer_head when we do a get_block
> > with delayed allocation in write_begin phase.
> Yeah, I knew about ext4 doing this. Thanks for pointing this out. I
> wanted to trigger a separate discussion about this and similar problems -
> the current state of buffer bits is quite messy (I think Ted complained
> about this as well recently) and we should somehow clean it up.
> In this particular case: What's the point in returning the buffer mapped?
> It does not make any sence logically (block *does not* have any physical
> location assigned) and technically you have to map it to some fake block
> and later remap it correctly when you do block allocation. So maybe I'm
> missing some good reason but from what I can see, it just does not make
> sence...
Marking it mapped make sure we don't do multiple get_block calls for
every write. For each write in write_begin path we do a get_block
call if the buffer is not mapped. (__block_prepare_write have more
details.)
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-28 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-27 13:00 [PATCH 0/11] Fix page_mkwrite() for blocksize < pagesize Jan Kara
2009-05-27 13:00 ` [PATCH 01/11] ext3: Get rid of extenddisksize parameter of ext3_get_blocks_handle() Jan Kara
2009-05-27 13:00 ` [PATCH 02/11] ext4: Get rid of extend_disksize parameter of ext4_get_blocks_handle() Jan Kara
2009-05-27 13:01 ` [PATCH 03/11] vfs: Add better VFS support for page_mkwrite when blocksize < pagesize Jan Kara
2009-05-27 16:00 ` Josef Bacik
2009-05-27 16:45 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-05-27 17:06 ` Josef Bacik
2009-05-28 13:03 ` Josef Bacik
2009-05-28 13:10 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-05-30 11:23 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-01 9:44 ` Jan Kara
2009-06-01 11:33 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-06-01 14:00 ` Jan Kara
2009-06-01 14:46 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-06-01 15:02 ` Jan Kara
2009-06-01 15:35 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-05-27 13:01 ` [PATCH 04/11] ext2: Allocate space for mmaped file on page fault Jan Kara
2009-05-27 13:01 ` [PATCH 05/11] ext4: Make sure blocks are properly allocated under mmaped page even when blocksize < pagesize Jan Kara
2009-05-27 14:30 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-27 14:52 ` Jan Kara
2009-06-04 14:09 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-27 13:01 ` [PATCH 06/11] ext3: Allocate space for mmaped file on page fault Jan Kara
2009-05-27 13:01 ` [PATCH 07/11] vfs: Implement generic per-cpu counters for delayed allocation Jan Kara
2009-05-27 13:01 ` [PATCH 08/11] vfs: Unmap underlying metadata of new data buffers only when buffer is mapped Jan Kara
2009-05-27 15:35 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-05-28 9:44 ` Jan Kara
2009-05-28 10:15 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2009-05-28 13:50 ` Jan Kara
2009-05-27 13:01 ` [PATCH 09/11] fs: Don't clear dirty bits in block_write_full_page() Jan Kara
2009-05-27 13:01 ` [PATCH 10/11] vfs: Export wakeup_pdflush Jan Kara
2009-05-27 13:01 ` [PATCH 11/11] ext3: Implement delayed allocation on page_mkwrite time Jan Kara
2009-05-27 14:23 ` [PATCH 0/11] Fix page_mkwrite() for blocksize < pagesize Theodore Tso
2009-05-27 14:59 ` Jan Kara
2009-06-04 17:11 ` Theodore Tso
2009-06-05 23:23 ` Jan Kara
2009-05-27 15:33 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-05-28 9:36 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090528101554.GB27978@skywalker \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).