Re: A tree to pull into linux-next

Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-21T06:09:07Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1040 bytes --]

Hi Andrew,

On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:52:21 +0200 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 04:48:26PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > I am happy to include this, but (no offense) I would like to hear from
> > > the ext3 and jbd maintainers (cc'd) about it.
> > >
> >
> > The main isssue would be that akpm often has ext3 changes stashed in
> > -mm. Having a separate ext3 tree makes sense, and if Jan wants to
> > maintain it, that makes good sense to me, but we should get Andrew's
> > sign off, and Jan should make sure he has any ext3/jbd patches that
> > might be in -mm, to avoid any potential patch conflicts.
> Yeah. It's upto Andrew. I think he pulls linux-next so he should notice
> conflicts. Anyway, I don't mind pushing the changes through him if he
> likes it more that way but I've felt that he's rather busy and this
> hopefully helps him a bit...

Any comments?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]