Re: A tree to pull into linux-next

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:08:52 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
> 
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:52:21 +0200 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 04:48:26PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > I am happy to include this, but (no offense) I would like to hear from
> > > > the ext3 and jbd maintainers (cc'd) about it.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > The main isssue would be that akpm often has ext3 changes stashed in
> > > -mm.  Having a separate ext3 tree makes sense, and if Jan wants to
> > > maintain it, that makes good sense to me, but we should get Andrew's
> > > sign off, and Jan should make sure he has any ext3/jbd patches that
> > > might be in -mm, to avoid any potential patch conflicts.
> >   Yeah. It's upto Andrew. I think he pulls linux-next so he should notice
> > conflicts. Anyway, I don't mind pushing the changes through him if he
> > likes it more that way but I've felt that he's rather busy and this
> > hopefully helps him a bit...
> 
> Any comments?

Sure, I'm OK with sending ext3/jbd stuff in Jan's direction.

Just don't break it ;)