From: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@redhat.com>
To: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ll_ver_fs data verification failure - 96TB fs
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 16:04:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090806200400.GC1800@shell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28623.1249307676@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org>
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 09:54:36AM -0400, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Just a heads-up for now. I ran ll_ver_fs on a 96TB fs - the write phase
> finished without problems, but the read phase encountered a problem:
>
> ...
> read File name: /mnt/dir00373/file026
>
> liverfs: verify /mnt/dir00373/file026 failed offset/timestamp/inode 3244298240/1248819541/1096796: found 3243249664/1248819541/1096796 instead
>
> liverfs: Data verification failed
> 770.45user 218639.65system 67:38:18elapsed 90%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
> 100357573552inputs+195522668184outputs (1major+414minor)pagefaults 0swaps
> make: *** [llver] Error 2
>
>
> The offset difference is exactly 1M, and it occurs about 3GB into the file.
Interesting - exactly 1M off. Does this correspond to anything
interesting in extent layout or block allocation boundaries?
Any chance you can patch ll_ver_fs to continue after the first error?
I'd be happy to write the patch for you.
> In total, there are 726 directories, each with 32 4GB files (except the last,
> which only has 12 files). So directory 373 is roughly half-way. I'll take a look
> at the block allocation of both the directory and the file and see if they are
> straddling the 16TB boundary (or other such).
Did you have a chance to look at what falls before and after the 16TB
boundary?
Thanks,
-VAL
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-06 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-03 13:54 ll_ver_fs data verification failure - 96TB fs Nick Dokos
2009-08-03 14:22 ` Nick Dokos
2009-08-06 20:04 ` Valerie Aurora [this message]
2009-08-06 20:37 ` Nick Dokos
2009-08-06 20:50 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-08-06 21:28 ` Nick Dokos
2009-08-06 21:43 ` Nick Dokos
2009-08-06 22:01 ` Nick Dokos
2009-08-06 22:54 ` Nick Dokos
2009-08-06 22:19 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-08-06 20:36 ` Valerie Aurora
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090806200400.GC1800@shell \
--to=vaurora@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicholas.dokos@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).