* [PATCH] Compile warning fix when enable EXT_DEBUG
@ 2009-08-12 15:32 Mingming
2009-08-12 15:47 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mingming @ 2009-08-12 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4; +Cc: Theodore Tso, Eric Sandeen
When enable EXT_DEBUG I got the following compile warning on PPC64
CC [M] fs/ext4/inode.o
CC [M] fs/ext4/extents.o
fs/ext4/extents.c: In function ‘ext4_ext_rm_leaf’:
fs/ext4/extents.c:2097: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘ext4_lblk_t’
fs/ext4/extents.c: In function ‘ext4_ext_get_blocks’:
fs/ext4/extents.c:2789: warning: format ‘%u’ expects type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘long unsigned int’
fs/ext4/extents.c:2852: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘ext4_lblk_t’
fs/ext4/extents.c:2953: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘unsigned int’
CC [M] fs/ext4/migrate.o
The patch fixed compile warning.
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Index: linux-2.6.31-rc4/fs/ext4/extents.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.31-rc4.orig/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ linux-2.6.31-rc4/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -2105,7 +2105,8 @@ ext4_ext_rm_leaf(handle_t *handle, struc
else
uninitialized = 0;
- ext_debug("remove ext %lu:%u\n", ex_ee_block, ex_ee_len);
+ ext_debug("remove ext %u:[%d]%d\n", ex_ee_block,
+ ext4_ext_is_uninitialized(ex), ex_ee_len);
path[depth].p_ext = ex;
a = ex_ee_block > start ? ex_ee_block : start;
@@ -2798,7 +2799,7 @@ int ext4_ext_get_blocks(handle_t *handle
struct ext4_allocation_request ar;
__clear_bit(BH_New, &bh_result->b_state);
- ext_debug("blocks %u/%u requested for inode %u\n",
+ ext_debug("blocks %u/%u requested for inode %lu\n",
iblock, max_blocks, inode->i_ino);
/* check in cache */
@@ -2861,7 +2862,7 @@ int ext4_ext_get_blocks(handle_t *handle
newblock = iblock - ee_block + ee_start;
/* number of remaining blocks in the extent */
allocated = ee_len - (iblock - ee_block);
- ext_debug("%u fit into %lu:%d -> %llu\n", iblock,
+ ext_debug("%u fit into %u:%d -> %llu\n", iblock,
ee_block, ee_len, newblock);
/* Do not put uninitialized extent in the cache */
@@ -2962,7 +2963,7 @@ int ext4_ext_get_blocks(handle_t *handle
newblock = ext4_mb_new_blocks(handle, &ar, &err);
if (!newblock)
goto out2;
- ext_debug("allocate new block: goal %llu, found %llu/%lu\n",
+ ext_debug("allocate new block: goal %llu, found %llu/%u\n",
ar.goal, newblock, allocated);
/* try to insert new extent into found leaf and return */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Compile warning fix when enable EXT_DEBUG
2009-08-12 15:32 [PATCH] Compile warning fix when enable EXT_DEBUG Mingming
@ 2009-08-12 15:47 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-08-12 16:02 ` Mingming
2009-08-12 16:10 ` Mingming
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2009-08-12 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mingming; +Cc: linux-ext4, Theodore Tso
Mingming wrote:
> When enable EXT_DEBUG I got the following compile warning on PPC64
>
> CC [M] fs/ext4/inode.o
> CC [M] fs/ext4/extents.o
> fs/ext4/extents.c: In function ‘ext4_ext_rm_leaf’:
> fs/ext4/extents.c:2097: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘ext4_lblk_t’
> fs/ext4/extents.c: In function ‘ext4_ext_get_blocks’:
> fs/ext4/extents.c:2789: warning: format ‘%u’ expects type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘long unsigned int’
> fs/ext4/extents.c:2852: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘ext4_lblk_t’
> fs/ext4/extents.c:2953: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘unsigned int’
> CC [M] fs/ext4/migrate.o
>
> The patch fixed compile warning.
and a little bit more ... :)
> Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
>
> Index: linux-2.6.31-rc4/fs/ext4/extents.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.31-rc4.orig/fs/ext4/extents.c
> +++ linux-2.6.31-rc4/fs/ext4/extents.c
> @@ -2105,7 +2105,8 @@ ext4_ext_rm_leaf(handle_t *handle, struc
> else
> uninitialized = 0;
>
> - ext_debug("remove ext %lu:%u\n", ex_ee_block, ex_ee_len);
> + ext_debug("remove ext %u:[%d]%d\n", ex_ee_block,
> + ext4_ext_is_uninitialized(ex), ex_ee_len);
> path[depth].p_ext = ex;
Shouldn't part of this be in your next patch, [PATCH]Show unwritten
extent flag in ext4_ext_show_leaf() ?
Thanks,
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Compile warning fix when enable EXT_DEBUG
2009-08-12 15:47 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2009-08-12 16:02 ` Mingming
2009-08-12 16:10 ` Mingming
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mingming @ 2009-08-12 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: linux-ext4, Theodore Tso
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 10:47 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Mingming wrote:
> > When enable EXT_DEBUG I got the following compile warning on PPC64
> >
> > CC [M] fs/ext4/inode.o
> > CC [M] fs/ext4/extents.o
> > fs/ext4/extents.c: In function ‘ext4_ext_rm_leaf’:
> > fs/ext4/extents.c:2097: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘ext4_lblk_t’
> > fs/ext4/extents.c: In function ‘ext4_ext_get_blocks’:
> > fs/ext4/extents.c:2789: warning: format ‘%u’ expects type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘long unsigned int’
> > fs/ext4/extents.c:2852: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘ext4_lblk_t’
> > fs/ext4/extents.c:2953: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘unsigned int’
> > CC [M] fs/ext4/migrate.o
> >
> > The patch fixed compile warning.
>
> and a little bit more ... :)
>
> > Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6.31-rc4/fs/ext4/extents.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.31-rc4.orig/fs/ext4/extents.c
> > +++ linux-2.6.31-rc4/fs/ext4/extents.c
> > @@ -2105,7 +2105,8 @@ ext4_ext_rm_leaf(handle_t *handle, struc
> > else
> > uninitialized = 0;
> >
> > - ext_debug("remove ext %lu:%u\n", ex_ee_block, ex_ee_len);
> > + ext_debug("remove ext %u:[%d]%d\n", ex_ee_block,
> > + ext4_ext_is_uninitialized(ex), ex_ee_len);
> > path[depth].p_ext = ex;
>
> Shouldn't part of this be in your next patch, [PATCH]Show unwritten
> extent flag in ext4_ext_show_leaf() ?
>
ah, that's right, I will resend the two patches :)
Mingming
> Thanks,
> -Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Compile warning fix when enable EXT_DEBUG
2009-08-12 15:47 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-08-12 16:02 ` Mingming
@ 2009-08-12 16:10 ` Mingming
2009-08-17 12:36 ` Theodore Tso
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mingming @ 2009-08-12 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: linux-ext4, Theodore Tso
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6.31-rc4/fs/ext4/extents.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.31-rc4.orig/fs/ext4/extents.c
> > +++ linux-2.6.31-rc4/fs/ext4/extents.c
> > @@ -2105,7 +2105,8 @@ ext4_ext_rm_leaf(handle_t *handle, struc
> > else
> > uninitialized = 0;
> >
> > - ext_debug("remove ext %lu:%u\n", ex_ee_block, ex_ee_len);
> > + ext_debug("remove ext %u:[%d]%d\n", ex_ee_block,
> > + ext4_ext_is_uninitialized(ex), ex_ee_len);
> > path[depth].p_ext = ex;
>
> Shouldn't part of this be in your next patch, [PATCH]Show unwritten
> extent flag in ext4_ext_show_leaf() ?
>
> Thanks,
> -Eric
Updated patch.
When enable EXT_DEBUG I got the following compile warning on PPC64
CC [M] fs/ext4/inode.o
CC [M] fs/ext4/extents.o
fs/ext4/extents.c: In function ‘ext4_ext_rm_leaf’:
fs/ext4/extents.c:2097: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘ext4_lblk_t’
fs/ext4/extents.c: In function ‘ext4_ext_get_blocks’:
fs/ext4/extents.c:2789: warning: format ‘%u’ expects type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘long unsigned int’
fs/ext4/extents.c:2852: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘ext4_lblk_t’
fs/ext4/extents.c:2953: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘unsigned int’
CC [M] fs/ext4/migrate.o
The patch fixed compile warning.
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Index: linux-2.6.31-rc4/fs/ext4/extents.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.31-rc4.orig/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ linux-2.6.31-rc4/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -2094,7 +2094,7 @@ ext4_ext_rm_leaf(handle_t *handle, struc
else
uninitialized = 0;
- ext_debug("remove ext %lu:%u\n", ex_ee_block, ex_ee_len);
+ ext_debug("remove ext %u:%d\n", ex_ee_block, ex_ee_len);
path[depth].p_ext = ex;
a = ex_ee_block > start ? ex_ee_block : start;
@@ -2786,7 +2786,7 @@ int ext4_ext_get_blocks(handle_t *handle
struct ext4_allocation_request ar;
__clear_bit(BH_New, &bh_result->b_state);
- ext_debug("blocks %u/%u requested for inode %u\n",
+ ext_debug("blocks %u/%u requested for inode %lu\n",
iblock, max_blocks, inode->i_ino);
/* check in cache */
@@ -2849,7 +2849,7 @@ int ext4_ext_get_blocks(handle_t *handle
newblock = iblock - ee_block + ee_start;
/* number of remaining blocks in the extent */
allocated = ee_len - (iblock - ee_block);
- ext_debug("%u fit into %lu:%d -> %llu\n", iblock,
+ ext_debug("%u fit into %u:%d -> %llu\n", iblock,
ee_block, ee_len, newblock);
/* Do not put uninitialized extent in the cache */
@@ -2950,7 +2950,7 @@ int ext4_ext_get_blocks(handle_t *handle
newblock = ext4_mb_new_blocks(handle, &ar, &err);
if (!newblock)
goto out2;
- ext_debug("allocate new block: goal %llu, found %llu/%lu\n",
+ ext_debug("allocate new block: goal %llu, found %llu/%u\n",
ar.goal, newblock, allocated);
/* try to insert new extent into found leaf and return */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-08-17 12:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-08-12 15:32 [PATCH] Compile warning fix when enable EXT_DEBUG Mingming
2009-08-12 15:47 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-08-12 16:02 ` Mingming
2009-08-12 16:10 ` Mingming
2009-08-17 12:36 ` Theodore Tso
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).