From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
To: Will Drewry <redpig@dataspill.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] resize2fs and uninit_bg questions
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:08:31 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090916190831.GH2537@webber.adilger.int> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090916162457.GA84213@freezingfog.local>
On Sep 16, 2009 11:24 -0500, Will Drewry wrote:
> I have a two questions with an accompanying patch for clarification.
>
> resize2fs is uninit_bg aware, but when it is expanding an ext4
> filesystem, it will always zero the inode tables. Is it safe to mimick
> mke2fs's write_inode_table(.., lazy_flag=1) and leave the new block
> groups' inode tables marked INODE_UNINIT, BLOCK_UNINIT and _not_ zero
> out the inode table if uninit_bg is supported?
>
> If it is okay, then it means offline resizing upwards can be just as
> fast as mke2fs. I've attached a patch which is probably incomplete.
> I'd love feedback as to the feasibility of the change and/or patch
> quality.
>
> As a follow-on, would it be sane to add support like this for
> online resizing. From a cursory investigation, it looks like
> setup_new_block_groups() could be modified to not zero itables
> if uninit_bg is supported, and INODE_ZEROED could be replaced
> with ΒG_*_UNINIT. However, I'm not sure if that is a naive
> view. I'm happy to send along a patch illustrating this change
> if that'd be helpful or welcome.
The question is why you would want to risk disk corruption vs.
the (likely not performance critical) online resize?
> Any and all feedback is appreciated -- even if it just for me
> to look at the archives/link/etc.
>
> diff --git a/resize/resize2fs.c b/resize/resize2fs.c
> index 1a5d910..9fcc3b9 100644
> --- a/resize/resize2fs.c
> +++ b/resize/resize2fs.c
> @@ -497,8 +497,7 @@ retry:
>
> fs->group_desc[i].bg_flags = 0;
> if (csum_flag)
> - fs->group_desc[i].bg_flags |= EXT2_BG_INODE_UNINIT |
> - EXT2_BG_INODE_ZEROED;
> + fs->group_desc[i].bg_flags |= EXT2_BG_INODE_UNINIT;
This shouldn't be unconditional, since most users will want the
safety of having zeroed inode tables.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-16 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-16 16:24 [PATCH][RFC] resize2fs and uninit_bg questions Will Drewry
2009-09-16 19:08 ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2009-09-16 20:42 ` Will Drewry
2009-09-16 21:22 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-09-16 23:11 ` Will Drewry
2009-09-17 19:28 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-09-18 6:09 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-09-18 11:43 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-09-18 13:56 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-09-19 12:19 ` Will Drewry
2009-09-23 9:34 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-09-23 19:28 ` Will Drewry
2009-09-25 6:21 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090916190831.GH2537@webber.adilger.int \
--to=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=redpig@dataspill.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).