From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 14354] Status of barrier requests in LVM and dm-crypt?
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:49:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091013144945.GA22223@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1MxPQM-00074N-Ph@closure.thunk.org>
On Mon, Oct 12 2009 at 2:15pm -0400,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to track down a problem relating to ext4 problems, in
> kernel bugzilla 14354. Originally it was thought this was a regression
> 2.6.31->2.6.32-rc1 regression, but the Aneesh Kumar's report shows a
> very similar fsck transcript using a 2.6.30-1 kernel (which makes makes
> it unclear whether this is really a regression or not), and all three
> reports are tied together by the use of device-mapper.
>
> The fsck logs are consistent barriers being disabled. As I recall under
> some circumstances device mapper silently drops barrier requests --- I
> thought this was fixed for device mapper in some cases. What's the
> current status of barrier requests in device mapper? Are they
> faithfully passed for standard (non-RAID) LVM2 volumes? When was this
> changed? What about dm-crypto volumes? (One of the reports was with a
> dm-crypt volume from what I can tell.)
Barrier infrastructure started to get added to the DM core in 2.6.30, see:
http://git.kernel.org/linus/af7e466a1ace
But barriers were not enabled for all DM targets (_except_ dm-multipath)
until 2.6.31. So 2.6.31's dm-crypt does support barriers, see:
http://git.kernel.org/linus/647c7db14ef9
If the underlying device(s) support barriers DM should faithfully pass
them on (again except for dm-multipath). Also, requests with barriers
that result in -EOPNOTSUPP are retried without the barrier, see:
http://git.kernel.org/linus/51aa32284958
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-13 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-12 18:15 [Bug 14354] Status of barrier requests in LVM and dm-crypt? Theodore Ts'o
2009-10-13 14:49 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2009-10-15 19:10 ` Mikulas Patocka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091013144945.GA22223@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).