From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 14354] Re: ext4 increased intolerance to unclean shutdown?
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 04:16:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091030081602.GM18464@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AEA0B71.5050805@redhat.com>
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 04:38:57PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
> I've been running my testcase, and I just hit the usual corruption with
> this patch in place after 8 iterations, I'm afraid.
Eric, since you have a relatively controllable reproduction case, have
you tried reproducing Alexey's bisection results? Specifically he
seemed to find that commit fe188c0e shows no problem, and commit
91ac6f43 is the first commit with problems?
Having to do multiple iterations will make doing a bisection a major
pain, but maybe we'll get something out of that.
Other things that might be worth doing given that you have a test case
would be to try reverting commit 91ac6f43, and see if that helps, and
to try this patch: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=23468
Or have you tried some of these experiments already?
Regards,
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-30 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <f7848160910152128h96237b7ga103915082d6412b@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-16 9:15 ` [Bug 14354] Re: ext4 increased intolerance to unclean shutdown? Theodore Tso
2009-10-16 13:06 ` Theodore Tso
2009-10-16 19:16 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-10-25 6:22 ` Pavel Machek
2009-10-26 13:49 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-10-16 22:24 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-10-26 15:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-27 10:15 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-10-29 20:10 ` Mingming
2009-10-29 21:25 ` Parag Warudkar
2009-10-29 21:38 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-10-30 8:16 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2009-10-30 13:54 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-10-30 19:56 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-10-31 9:15 ` Theodore Tso
2009-10-31 15:24 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-10-29 21:42 ` Theodore Tso
2009-10-29 21:52 ` Parag Warudkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091030081602.GM18464@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=parag.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).