From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Mingming <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Cc: ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 v2] Direct IO return value fix for holes/fallocate
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 21:09:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091104020915.GF6510@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1255050796.4931.190.camel@mingming-laptop>
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 06:13:16PM -0700, Mingming wrote:
> ext4: Direct IO return value fix for holes/fallocate
>
> When direct IO complete, ext4 will convert unwritten extents to written,
> for
> writes over preallocated space, or holes.
>
> ext4_direct_IO should returns the number of bytes read/write on success.
> However there is a bug that cause ext4_direct_IO returns the number of
> bytes converted to written extents, which is 0 on success. This bug
> causes
> direct IO falls back to buffered IO even on sucessful rewrites or
> preallocated space.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
I fixed up some white space issues, and rewrote the patch descriptions
as follows:
ext4: fix ext4_ext_direct_IO()'s return value after converting uninit extents
After a direct I/O request covering an uninitalized extent (i.e.,
created using the fallocate system call) or a hole in a file, ext4
will convert the uninitialized extent so it is marked as initialized
by calling ext4_convert_unwritten_extents(). This function returns
zero on success.
This return value was getting returned by ext4_direct_IO(); however
the file system's direct_IO function is supposed to return the number
of bytes read or written on a success. By returning zero, it confused
the direct I/O code into falling back to buffered I/O unnecessarily.
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Added to the patch queue.
- Ted
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-04 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-09 1:13 [PATCH 1/4 v2] Direct IO return value fix for holes/fallocate Mingming
2009-11-04 2:09 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091104020915.GF6510@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=curtw@google.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).