From: tytso@mit.edu
To: Kailas Joshi <kailas.joshi@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com>
Subject: Re: Help on Implementation of EXT3 type Ordered Mode in EXT4
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:07:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100212200726.GD5337@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38f6fb7d1002111922i4ae6131w6b5cce79344efc63@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 08:52:15AM +0530, Kailas Joshi wrote:
> Won't this get fixed by performing early reservations as mentioned in
> my scheme? We are reserving required credits in the path of write
> system call and these will be kept reserved until transaction commit.
> So, the journal space for allocation at commit will be guaranteed.
Yes, if you account for these separately. One challenge is
over-estimating the needed credits will be tricky. If we go down this
path, be sure that the bonnie style write(fd, &ch, 1) in a tight loop
doesn't end up reserving a separate set of credits for each write
system call to the same block. (It can be done; if the DA block is
already instantiated, you can assume that credits have already been
reserved.)
> Sorry, I didn't understand why processes need to be suspended.
> In my scheme, I am issuing magic handle only after locking the current
> transaction. AFAIK after the transaction is locked, it can receive the
> block journaling requests for already created handles(in our case, for
> already reserved journal space), and the new concurrent requests for
> journal_start() will go to the new current transaction. Since, the
> credits for locked transaction are fixed (by means of early
> reservations) we can know whether journal has enough space for the new
> journal_start(). So, as long as journal has enough space available,
> new processes need now be stalled.
But while you are modifying blocks that need to go into the journal
via the locked (old) transaction, it's not safe to start a new
transaction and start issuing handles against the new transaction.
Just to give one example, suppose we need to update the extent
allocation tree for an inode in the locked/committing transaction as
the delayed allocation blocks are being resolved --- and in another
process, that inode is getting truncated or unlinked, which also needs
to modify the extent allocation tree? Hilarty ensues, unless you use
a block all attempts to create a new handle (practically speaking, by
blocking all attempts to start a new transaction), until this new
delayed allocation resolution phase which you have proposed is
complete.
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-12 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-04 5:45 Help on Implementation of EXT3 type Ordered Mode in EXT4 Kailas Joshi
2010-02-09 16:05 ` Jan Kara
2010-02-09 17:41 ` tytso
[not found] ` <38f6fb7d1002102301x278c3ddt153f570dd1423074@mail.gmail.com>
2010-02-11 7:32 ` Kailas Joshi
2010-02-11 19:56 ` tytso
2010-02-12 3:22 ` Kailas Joshi
2010-02-12 20:07 ` tytso [this message]
2010-02-13 8:43 ` Kailas Joshi
2010-02-15 15:00 ` Jan Kara
2010-02-16 10:10 ` Kailas Joshi
2010-02-16 13:10 ` Jan Kara
2010-02-16 14:18 ` tytso
2010-02-17 15:37 ` Kailas Joshi
[not found] ` <38f6fb7d1003182023j5513640csdc797adb49393ea0@mail.gmail.com>
2010-03-22 16:52 ` Jan Kara
2010-03-23 10:41 ` Kailas Joshi
2010-03-29 15:45 ` Jan Kara
2010-04-17 4:42 ` Kailas Joshi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100212200726.GD5337@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jiayingz@google.com \
--cc=kailas.joshi@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).