From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: quota_write cross block boundary behaviour
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:46:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100216184654.GD3153@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1266338022-24298-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org>
On Tue 16-02-10 19:33:41, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> We always assume what dquot update result in changes in one data block
> But ext4_quota_write() function may handle cross block boundary writes
> In fact if this ever happen it will result in incorrect journal credits
> reservation. And later bug_on triggering. As soon this never happen the
> boundary cross loop is NOOP. In order to make things straight
> let's remove this loop and assert cross boundary condition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Yeah, originally I thought it might be useful to support a possibility of
multiblock writes but in the end we never needed it and currently e.g. OCFS2
would already BUG on that so yes, this is a good simplification.
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
I've merged the ext3 version of the patch into my tree. Ted, will you
merge this ext4 cleanup please?
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext4/super.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
> 1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 9e45e62..d5596ca 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -3940,9 +3940,7 @@ static ssize_t ext4_quota_write(struct super_block *sb, int type,
> ext4_lblk_t blk = off >> EXT4_BLOCK_SIZE_BITS(sb);
> int err = 0;
> int offset = off & (sb->s_blocksize - 1);
> - int tocopy;
> int journal_quota = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_qf_names[type] != NULL;
> - size_t towrite = len;
> struct buffer_head *bh;
> handle_t *handle = journal_current_handle();
>
> @@ -3952,52 +3950,53 @@ static ssize_t ext4_quota_write(struct super_block *sb, int type,
> (unsigned long long)off, (unsigned long long)len);
> return -EIO;
> }
> + /*
> + * Since we account only one data block in transaction credits,
> + * then it is impossible to cross a block boundary.
> + */
> + if (sb->s_blocksize - offset < len) {
> + ext4_msg(sb, KERN_WARNING, "Quota write (off=%llu, len=%llu)"
> + " cancelled because not block aligned",
> + (unsigned long long)off, (unsigned long long)len);
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> mutex_lock_nested(&inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_QUOTA);
> - while (towrite > 0) {
> - tocopy = sb->s_blocksize - offset < towrite ?
> - sb->s_blocksize - offset : towrite;
> - bh = ext4_bread(handle, inode, blk, 1, &err);
> - if (!bh)
> + bh = ext4_bread(handle, inode, blk, 1, &err);
> + if (!bh)
> + goto out;
> + if (journal_quota) {
> + err = ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle, bh);
> + if (err) {
> + brelse(bh);
> goto out;
> - if (journal_quota) {
> - err = ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle, bh);
> - if (err) {
> - brelse(bh);
> - goto out;
> - }
> }
> - lock_buffer(bh);
> - memcpy(bh->b_data+offset, data, tocopy);
> - flush_dcache_page(bh->b_page);
> - unlock_buffer(bh);
> - if (journal_quota)
> - err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, NULL, bh);
> - else {
> - /* Always do at least ordered writes for quotas */
> - err = ext4_jbd2_file_inode(handle, inode);
> - mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
> - }
> - brelse(bh);
> - if (err)
> - goto out;
> - offset = 0;
> - towrite -= tocopy;
> - data += tocopy;
> - blk++;
> }
> + lock_buffer(bh);
> + memcpy(bh->b_data+offset, data, len);
> + flush_dcache_page(bh->b_page);
> + unlock_buffer(bh);
> + if (journal_quota)
> + err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, NULL, bh);
> + else {
> + /* Always do at least ordered writes for quotas */
> + err = ext4_jbd2_file_inode(handle, inode);
> + mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
> + }
> + brelse(bh);
> out:
> - if (len == towrite) {
> + if (err) {
> mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> return err;
> }
> - if (inode->i_size < off+len-towrite) {
> - i_size_write(inode, off+len-towrite);
> + if (inode->i_size < off + len) {
> + i_size_write(inode, off + len);
> EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize = inode->i_size;
> }
> inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
> ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, inode);
> mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> - return len - towrite;
> + return len;
> }
>
> #endif
> --
> 1.6.6
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-16 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-16 16:33 [PATCH 1/2] ext4: quota_write cross block boundary behaviour Dmitry Monakhov
2010-02-16 16:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] ext3: " Dmitry Monakhov
2010-02-16 18:46 ` Jan Kara [this message]
[not found] ` <878wab6p3s.fsf@openvz.org>
2010-03-02 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] ext4: " tytso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100216184654.GD3153@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).