From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Kailas Joshi <kailas.joshi@gmail.com>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com>
Subject: Re: Help on Implementation of EXT3 type Ordered Mode in EXT4
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:45:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100329154534.GE5835@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38f6fb7d1003230341j4ff52fffidc614d566476b5bc@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Tue 23-03-10 16:11:45, Kailas Joshi wrote:
> I have Lock Debugging enables but that didn't give any warnings.
> However, when I did echo "w" >/proc/sysrq-trigger after system lockup,
> I got the stack trace for locked up process.
>
> Following are the stack traces of the processes (I suspect) resulting
> in total system lockup -
<snip>
So kjournald is waiting on a page lock and everyone else waits for
kjournald to finish committing or for page lock as well. The strange thing
is that I don't see anybody who could hold the page lock everyone is
waiting on. So I think further debugging should go in this direction - find
out on which page do we wait and who is holding it's lock (you'd need to
add tracking of page lock owner but that shouldn't be too hard).
> I have few questions here.
> I guess process named jbd2/sdb1-8 is kjournald thread. But what is
Yes.
> flush-8:16 process? Is it the kernel thread for periodically writing
> dirty pages to disk?
Yes.
> Is it the case that these threads are running concurrently at certain
> time and are trying to get lock on same pages resulting into deadlock?
It should not happen - they should always acquire page lock in
index-increasing order so that way deadlocks should be avoided...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-29 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-04 5:45 Help on Implementation of EXT3 type Ordered Mode in EXT4 Kailas Joshi
2010-02-09 16:05 ` Jan Kara
2010-02-09 17:41 ` tytso
[not found] ` <38f6fb7d1002102301x278c3ddt153f570dd1423074@mail.gmail.com>
2010-02-11 7:32 ` Kailas Joshi
2010-02-11 19:56 ` tytso
2010-02-12 3:22 ` Kailas Joshi
2010-02-12 20:07 ` tytso
2010-02-13 8:43 ` Kailas Joshi
2010-02-15 15:00 ` Jan Kara
2010-02-16 10:10 ` Kailas Joshi
2010-02-16 13:10 ` Jan Kara
2010-02-16 14:18 ` tytso
2010-02-17 15:37 ` Kailas Joshi
[not found] ` <38f6fb7d1003182023j5513640csdc797adb49393ea0@mail.gmail.com>
2010-03-22 16:52 ` Jan Kara
2010-03-23 10:41 ` Kailas Joshi
2010-03-29 15:45 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2010-04-17 4:42 ` Kailas Joshi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100329154534.GE5835@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jiayingz@google.com \
--cc=kailas.joshi@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).