linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch,rfc v2] ext3/4: enhance fsync performance when using cfq
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 16:06:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100408140653.GP10103@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49pr2a9h3n.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>

On Thu, Apr 08 2010, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 01:00:45PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> 
> >> I like the concept, it's definitely useful (and your results amply
> >> demonstrate that). I was thinking if there was a way in through the ioc
> >> itself, rather than bdi -> queue and like you are doing. But I can't
> >> think of a nice way to do it, so this is probably as good as it gets.
> >> 
> >
> > I think, one issue with ioc based approach will be that it will then call
> > yield operation on all the devices in the system where this context has ever
> > done any IO. With bdi based approach this call will remain limited to
> > a smaller set of devices.
> 
> Which actually brings up the question of whether this needs some
> knowledge of whether the journal is on the same device as the file
> system!  In such a case, we need not yield.  I think I'll stick my head
> in the sand for this one.  ;-)

Yes, that is true. But that should be relatively easy to check.

-- 
Jens Axboe

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-08 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-07 21:18 [patch,rfc v2] ext3/4: enhance fsync performance when using cfq Jeff Moyer
2010-04-07 21:46 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-08 11:04   ` Jens Axboe
2010-04-08 14:05     ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-08 14:09       ` Jens Axboe
2010-04-08 14:17         ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-08 14:24         ` Jeff Moyer
2010-04-08 19:23           ` Jens Axboe
2010-04-21 20:42         ` Mike Snitzer
2010-04-21 20:52           ` Jeff Moyer
2010-04-08 11:00 ` Jens Axboe
2010-04-08 13:59   ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-08 14:03     ` Jens Axboe
2010-04-08 14:03     ` Jeff Moyer
2010-04-08 14:06       ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2010-04-08 14:10       ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-08 14:25         ` Jeff Moyer
2010-04-08 14:31           ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-08 19:10   ` Jeff Moyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100408140653.GP10103@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).