From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch,rfc v2] ext3/4: enhance fsync performance when using cfq
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 16:06:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100408140653.GP10103@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49pr2a9h3n.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
On Thu, Apr 08 2010, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 01:00:45PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> >> I like the concept, it's definitely useful (and your results amply
> >> demonstrate that). I was thinking if there was a way in through the ioc
> >> itself, rather than bdi -> queue and like you are doing. But I can't
> >> think of a nice way to do it, so this is probably as good as it gets.
> >>
> >
> > I think, one issue with ioc based approach will be that it will then call
> > yield operation on all the devices in the system where this context has ever
> > done any IO. With bdi based approach this call will remain limited to
> > a smaller set of devices.
>
> Which actually brings up the question of whether this needs some
> knowledge of whether the journal is on the same device as the file
> system! In such a case, we need not yield. I think I'll stick my head
> in the sand for this one. ;-)
Yes, that is true. But that should be relatively easy to check.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-08 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-07 21:18 [patch,rfc v2] ext3/4: enhance fsync performance when using cfq Jeff Moyer
2010-04-07 21:46 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-08 11:04 ` Jens Axboe
2010-04-08 14:05 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-08 14:09 ` Jens Axboe
2010-04-08 14:17 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-08 14:24 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-04-08 19:23 ` Jens Axboe
2010-04-21 20:42 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-04-21 20:52 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-04-08 11:00 ` Jens Axboe
2010-04-08 13:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-08 14:03 ` Jens Axboe
2010-04-08 14:03 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-04-08 14:06 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2010-04-08 14:10 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-08 14:25 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-04-08 14:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-08 19:10 ` Jeff Moyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100408140653.GP10103@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).