From: Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm>,
Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com>,
"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Driver <Linux-Driver@qlogic.com>,
Thomas Helle <Helle@tuebingen.mpg.de>
Subject: Re: ext4: (2.6.34-rc4): This should not happen!! Data will be lost
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:37:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100420153723.GE25507@skl-net.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100417223854.GD25507@skl-net.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3493 bytes --]
On 00:38, Andre Noll wrote:
> > I still don't think it's likely a filesystem problem but maybe you can
> > pinpoint the fs behavior that triggers it.
>
> I'll try to reproduce the problem using different timeout values and the
> ext4 options you suggest. If I can find a reliable reproducer, I'll run
> blktrace and post the results.
Here are some results. Prior to running the tests I wrote a bunch of
10G files and then filled the fs completely with 2T files containing
zeros. Each of the tests below consisted of three runs of
- remove 5 of the above 10G files to make 50G space available
- run stress -d 5 --hdd-bytes 10G --hdd-noclean until it dies
- run fsck if any fs errors occured
Summary: Increasing the device timeout to 60s _or_ disabling barriers
makes the problem go away. Deactivating delayed allocation makes the
problem worse.
- device timeout 60s, default ext4 parameters
No problems at all, all three runs OK
- device timeout 30s, default ext4 parameters
1. OK
2. dmesg:
qla2xxx 0000:06:09.0: scsi(0:0:0): Abort command issued -- 1 2ea270b 2002.
end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 7812889640
Aborting journal on device sda-8.
EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_journal_start_sb: Detected aborted journal
EXT4-fs (sda): Remounting filesystem read-only
fsck:
Inode 287, i_blocks is 4294918568, should be 416. Fix? yes
Inode 288, i_size is 2198897426432, should be 2199023251456. Fix? yes
Inode 288, i_blocks is 4294721960, should be 416. Fix? yes
3.
qla2xxx 0000:06:09.0: scsi(0:0:0): Abort command issued -- 1 2ece6a8 2002.
qla2xxx 0000:06:09.0: scsi(0:0:0): Abort command issued -- 1 2ece6dc 2002.
end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 7812690136
Aborting journal on device sda-8.
EXT4-fs error (device sda) in ext4_free_blocks: Journal has aborted
EXT4-fs error (device sda) in ext4_ext_remove_space: Journal has aborted
EXT4-fs error (device sda) in ext4_reserve_inode_write: Journal has aborted
EXT4-fs error (device sda) in ext4_ext_truncate: Journal has aborted
EXT4-fs error (device sda) in ext4_reserve_inode_write: Journal has aborted
EXT4-fs error (device sda) in ext4_orphan_del: Journal has aborted
EXT4-fs error (device sda) in ext4_reserve_inode_write: Journal has aborted
EXT4-fs error (device sda) in ext4_delete_inode: Journal has aborted
EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_journal_start_sb: Detected aborted journal
EXT4-fs (sda): Remounting filesystem read-only
fsck:
e2fsck 1.41.10 (10-Feb-2009)
/dev/sda: recovering journal
Clearing orphaned inode 179 (uid=0, gid=0, mode=0100600, size=0)
/dev/sda: clean, 301/244158464 files, 1935004235/1953247232 blocks
- device timeout 30s, nodelalloc
This seems to trigger the problem more reliably:
1.
dmesg: same qla, ext4 errors as above
fsck: orphaned inodes as above
2. and 3.
errors already while removing files:
rm: cannot remove `stress.98q1gG': Read-only file system
dmesg: same qla/ext4 errors, but also
JBD2: Detected IO errors while flushing file data on sda-8
fsck: clean
- device timeout 30s, nobarrier
No problem at all, all three runs OK.
Eric, are you still interested in seeing the blktrace output? Suppose,
I should use a 30s timeout, nodealloc and barriers=1 as this triggers
the problem within minutes.
Regards
Andre
--
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-20 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-16 12:35 ext4: (2.6.34-rc4): This should not happen!! Data will be lost Andre Noll
2010-04-16 14:29 ` tytso
2010-04-16 15:02 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-04-16 15:30 ` Andre Noll
2010-04-16 15:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-04-16 15:52 ` Andrew Vasquez
2010-04-16 16:08 ` Andre Noll
2010-04-16 16:36 ` Andrew Vasquez
2010-04-16 17:07 ` Andre Noll
2010-04-17 16:55 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-04-17 18:19 ` Andre Noll
2010-04-17 18:43 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-04-17 20:45 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-04-17 22:38 ` Andre Noll
2010-04-20 15:37 ` Andre Noll [this message]
2010-04-20 16:51 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-04-20 17:26 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-04-20 18:35 ` Andre Noll
2010-04-20 20:09 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-04-20 17:46 ` Andre Noll
2010-04-22 8:21 ` Andre Noll
2010-04-21 8:57 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2010-04-21 13:47 ` Andre Noll
2010-04-16 15:57 ` Andre Noll
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100420153723.GE25507@skl-net.de \
--to=maan@systemlinux.org \
--cc=Helle@tuebingen.mpg.de \
--cc=Linux-Driver@qlogic.com \
--cc=andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com \
--cc=bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).