linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>
Cc: coly.li@suse.de, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	Eelis <opensuse.org@contacts.eelis.net>,
	Amit Arora <aarora@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent creation of files larger than RLIMIT_FSIZE using fallocate
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:33:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100430143319.d51d6d77.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201004291014.07194.knikanth@suse.de>


(Amit Arora <aarora@in.ibm.com> wrote fallocate.  cc added)

On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:14:06 +0530
Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de> wrote:

> Here is an updated patch that takes the i_mutex and calls inode_newsize_ok()
> only for regular files.

err, no.  It's taking i_lock where it meant to take i_mutex.

> Thanks
> Nikanth
> 
> Prevent creation of files larger than RLIMIT_FSIZE using fallocate.
> 
> Currently using posix_fallocate one can bypass an RLIMIT_FSIZE limit
> and create a file larger than the limit. Add a check for new size in
> the fallocate system call.
> 
> File-systems supporting fallocate such as ext4 are affected by this
> bug.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>
> Reported-by: Eelis - <opensuse.org@contacts.eelis.net>
> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/fs/open.c b/fs/open.c
> index 74e5cd9..4ca57c9 100644
> --- a/fs/open.c
> +++ b/fs/open.c
> @@ -405,17 +405,26 @@ int do_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
>  	if (S_ISFIFO(inode->i_mode))
>  		return -ESPIPE;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Let individual file system decide if it supports preallocation
> -	 * for directories or not.
> -	 */
> -	if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && !S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -
> -	/* Check for wrap through zero too */
> -	if (((offset + len) > inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes) || ((offset + len) < 0))
> +	/* Check for wrap through zero */
> +	if (offset+len < 0)
>  		return -EFBIG;

I suggest that this test be moved up to where the function tests `if
(offset < 0 || len <= 0)' - it seems more logical.

Also,

-	if (offset+len < 0)
+	if (offset + len < 0)

for consistency with most other kernel code, please.

> +	if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) {
> +		spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> +		ret = inode_newsize_ok(inode, (offset + len));
> +		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	} else if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Let individual file system decide if it supports
> +		 * preallocation for directories or not.
> +		 */
> +		if (offset > inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes)
> +			return -EFBIG;
> +	} else
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>  	if (!inode->i_op->fallocate)
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;

Also, there doesn't seem to be much point in doing

	mutex_lock(i_mutex);
	if (some_condition)
		bale out
	mutex_unlock(i_mutex);

	<stuff>

because `some_condition' can now become true before or during the
execution of `stuff'.

IOW, it's racy.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-30 21:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-28 13:24 [PATCH] Prevent creation of files larger than RLIMIT_FSIZE using fallocate Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-04-28 16:15 ` Coly Li
     [not found]   ` <201004291014.07194.knikanth@suse.de>
     [not found]     ` <4BD9239D.6060907@suse.de>
2010-04-29  9:23       ` Andreas Dilger
2010-04-30 21:33     ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-04-30 21:40       ` Andreas Dilger
2010-05-01  7:04       ` Amit K. Arora
2010-05-01 10:18         ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-05-03  7:01           ` Amit K. Arora
2010-05-03  8:31           ` [PATCH] New testcase to check if fallocate respects RLIMIT_FSIZE or not Amit K. Arora
2010-05-04 20:44             ` Eric Sandeen
2010-05-05  7:55               ` [PATCH v2] " Amit K. Arora
2010-05-05 15:50                 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-05-03  4:23         ` [PATCH] Prevent creation of files larger than RLIMIT_FSIZE using fallocate Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-05-03  6:59           ` Amit K. Arora
2010-05-03  7:49             ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-05-04  5:44             ` [PATCH] btrfs: " Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-05-04  5:45             ` [PATCH] ext4: " Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-05-04  6:28               ` Amit K. Arora
2010-05-21  1:11                 ` tytso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100430143319.d51d6d77.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aarora@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=adilger@sun.com \
    --cc=coly.li@suse.de \
    --cc=knikanth@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=opensuse.org@contacts.eelis.net \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).