From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>
Cc: coly.li@suse.de, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
Eelis <opensuse.org@contacts.eelis.net>,
Amit Arora <aarora@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent creation of files larger than RLIMIT_FSIZE using fallocate
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:33:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100430143319.d51d6d77.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201004291014.07194.knikanth@suse.de>
(Amit Arora <aarora@in.ibm.com> wrote fallocate. cc added)
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:14:06 +0530
Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de> wrote:
> Here is an updated patch that takes the i_mutex and calls inode_newsize_ok()
> only for regular files.
err, no. It's taking i_lock where it meant to take i_mutex.
> Thanks
> Nikanth
>
> Prevent creation of files larger than RLIMIT_FSIZE using fallocate.
>
> Currently using posix_fallocate one can bypass an RLIMIT_FSIZE limit
> and create a file larger than the limit. Add a check for new size in
> the fallocate system call.
>
> File-systems supporting fallocate such as ext4 are affected by this
> bug.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>
> Reported-by: Eelis - <opensuse.org@contacts.eelis.net>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/fs/open.c b/fs/open.c
> index 74e5cd9..4ca57c9 100644
> --- a/fs/open.c
> +++ b/fs/open.c
> @@ -405,17 +405,26 @@ int do_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> if (S_ISFIFO(inode->i_mode))
> return -ESPIPE;
>
> - /*
> - * Let individual file system decide if it supports preallocation
> - * for directories or not.
> - */
> - if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && !S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> - /* Check for wrap through zero too */
> - if (((offset + len) > inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes) || ((offset + len) < 0))
> + /* Check for wrap through zero */
> + if (offset+len < 0)
> return -EFBIG;
I suggest that this test be moved up to where the function tests `if
(offset < 0 || len <= 0)' - it seems more logical.
Also,
- if (offset+len < 0)
+ if (offset + len < 0)
for consistency with most other kernel code, please.
> + if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) {
> + spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> + ret = inode_newsize_ok(inode, (offset + len));
> + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + } else if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
> + /*
> + * Let individual file system decide if it supports
> + * preallocation for directories or not.
> + */
> + if (offset > inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes)
> + return -EFBIG;
> + } else
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> if (!inode->i_op->fallocate)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
Also, there doesn't seem to be much point in doing
mutex_lock(i_mutex);
if (some_condition)
bale out
mutex_unlock(i_mutex);
<stuff>
because `some_condition' can now become true before or during the
execution of `stuff'.
IOW, it's racy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-30 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-28 13:24 [PATCH] Prevent creation of files larger than RLIMIT_FSIZE using fallocate Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-04-28 16:15 ` Coly Li
[not found] ` <201004291014.07194.knikanth@suse.de>
[not found] ` <4BD9239D.6060907@suse.de>
2010-04-29 9:23 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-04-30 21:33 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-04-30 21:40 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-05-01 7:04 ` Amit K. Arora
2010-05-01 10:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-05-03 7:01 ` Amit K. Arora
2010-05-03 8:31 ` [PATCH] New testcase to check if fallocate respects RLIMIT_FSIZE or not Amit K. Arora
2010-05-04 20:44 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-05-05 7:55 ` [PATCH v2] " Amit K. Arora
2010-05-05 15:50 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-05-03 4:23 ` [PATCH] Prevent creation of files larger than RLIMIT_FSIZE using fallocate Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-05-03 6:59 ` Amit K. Arora
2010-05-03 7:49 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-05-04 5:44 ` [PATCH] btrfs: " Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-05-04 5:45 ` [PATCH] ext4: " Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-05-04 6:28 ` Amit K. Arora
2010-05-21 1:11 ` tytso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100430143319.d51d6d77.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aarora@in.ibm.com \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=coly.li@suse.de \
--cc=knikanth@suse.de \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=opensuse.org@contacts.eelis.net \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).