From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tytso@mit.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ext4: Clear the EXT4_EOFBLOCKS_FL flag only when warranted Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 09:03:31 -0400 Message-ID: <20100525130331.GC5556@thunk.org> References: <20100525041737.GB5556@thunk.org> <1274761117-26560-2-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> <87zkzola0r.fsf@openvz.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ext4 Developers List To: Dmitry Monakhov Return-path: Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:48878 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753878Ab0EYNDg (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2010 09:03:36 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87zkzola0r.fsf@openvz.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:23:48AM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > This condition was triggered during fsstress test. So I consider > it as rare but possible in real life. Nor than less it is better > to fix it now, than fix it in response from a midnight call from some > crazy customer :) Fair enough, I just didn't have an 8-core system handy when I was dealing with it, so hand-crafted an fs image. BTW, whatever happened to the xfstests patch that you created in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15792 Did you submit it to the xfstests folks for inclusion? - Ted