From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] ext4 trace events cause NULL pointer dereferences
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:13:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100723011315.GC16373@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100722054957.GA11670@infradead.org>
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 01:49:57AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> I think ext4 is simply using an incorrectly typed tracepoint here.
> If you want it to be useful in any way it needs a sb paramter and
> an optional inode paramter, not the allocation context.
I agree; this is the patch that I had whipped up to fix the problem.
(See below)
> Also the whole ext4_mb_release_group_pa function seems to be a bit
> misdesigned. The code using ac is a totally separate block at the
> end of the function and does work that's unrelated to the rest
> of the function. Just making it a separate helper can calling it
> only from those places that have the allocation context would make
> the code more clear.
I need to look more closely at this. If I had time there would be a
lot of things that I'd be refactoring and cleaning up in mballoc.c....
- Ted
>From 52f9a0d80ccdb1b23e364221167bb55b2886cc18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:09:44 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix potential NULL dereference while tracing
The allocation_context pointer can be NULL.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 4 ++--
include/trace/events/ext4.h | 20 ++++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 3dfad95..8b3b934 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -3575,7 +3575,7 @@ ext4_mb_release_inode_pa(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, struct buffer_head *bitmap_bh,
trace_ext4_mballoc_discard(ac);
}
- trace_ext4_mb_release_inode_pa(ac, pa, grp_blk_start + bit,
+ trace_ext4_mb_release_inode_pa(sb, ac, pa, grp_blk_start + bit,
next - bit);
mb_free_blocks(pa->pa_inode, e4b, bit, next - bit);
bit = next + 1;
@@ -3606,7 +3606,7 @@ ext4_mb_release_group_pa(struct ext4_buddy *e4b,
ext4_group_t group;
ext4_grpblk_t bit;
- trace_ext4_mb_release_group_pa(ac, pa);
+ trace_ext4_mb_release_group_pa(sb, ac, pa);
BUG_ON(pa->pa_deleted == 0);
ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(sb, pa->pa_pstart, &group, &bit);
BUG_ON(group != e4b->bd_group && pa->pa_len != 0);
diff --git a/include/trace/events/ext4.h b/include/trace/events/ext4.h
index f3865c7..01e9e00 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/ext4.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/ext4.h
@@ -395,11 +395,12 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(ext4__mb_new_pa, ext4_mb_new_group_pa,
);
TRACE_EVENT(ext4_mb_release_inode_pa,
- TP_PROTO(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
+ TP_PROTO(struct super_block *sb,
+ struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
struct ext4_prealloc_space *pa,
unsigned long long block, unsigned int count),
- TP_ARGS(ac, pa, block, count),
+ TP_ARGS(sb, ac, pa, block, count),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field( dev_t, dev )
@@ -410,8 +411,9 @@ TRACE_EVENT(ext4_mb_release_inode_pa,
),
TP_fast_assign(
- __entry->dev = ac->ac_sb->s_dev;
- __entry->ino = ac->ac_inode->i_ino;
+ __entry->dev = sb->s_dev;
+ __entry->ino = (ac && ac->ac_inode) ?
+ ac->ac_inode->i_ino : 0;
__entry->block = block;
__entry->count = count;
),
@@ -422,10 +424,11 @@ TRACE_EVENT(ext4_mb_release_inode_pa,
);
TRACE_EVENT(ext4_mb_release_group_pa,
- TP_PROTO(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
+ TP_PROTO(struct super_block *sb,
+ struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
struct ext4_prealloc_space *pa),
- TP_ARGS(ac, pa),
+ TP_ARGS(sb, ac, pa),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field( dev_t, dev )
@@ -436,8 +439,9 @@ TRACE_EVENT(ext4_mb_release_group_pa,
),
TP_fast_assign(
- __entry->dev = ac->ac_sb->s_dev;
- __entry->ino = ac->ac_inode->i_ino;
+ __entry->dev = sb->s_dev;
+ __entry->ino = (ac && ac->ac_inode) ?
+ ac->ac_inode->i_ino : 0;
__entry->pa_pstart = pa->pa_pstart;
__entry->pa_len = pa->pa_len;
),
--
1.7.0.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-23 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-16 8:48 [BUG] ext4 trace events cause NULL pointer dereferences Li Zefan
2010-07-21 13:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-21 14:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-07-21 14:21 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-07-22 5:45 ` Li Zefan
2010-07-22 5:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-23 1:13 ` Ted Ts'o [this message]
2010-07-23 5:47 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-23 9:11 ` Theodore Tso
2010-07-23 9:19 ` Li Zefan
2010-07-26 2:20 ` Li Zefan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100723011315.GC16373@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).