From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 12:12:08 GMT Message-ID: <201008051212.o75CC8VG014184@demeter.kernel.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from demeter.kernel.org ([140.211.167.39]:34021 "EHLO demeter.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758900Ab0HEMMS (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2010 08:12:18 -0400 Received: from demeter.kernel.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.kernel.org (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o75CC8of014204 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 12:12:09 GMT In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312 --- Comment #22 from Tejun Heo 2010-08-05 12:11:59 --- Created an attachment (id=27356) --> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27356) sd-delay-uevent.patch This would make sd announce the sd device after block device is set up, which probably is the right thing to do but it still is wrong to trigger WARN_ON() when a user program accesses a device node which isn't ready yet. Can't that warning be removed by using a default bdi w/ BDI_CAP_NO_ACCT_AND_WRITEBACK set for block device nodes? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug.