linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 4/6] jbd: remove dependency on __GFP_NOFAIL
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:21:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100823222100.GE3380@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100823151129.433875d9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Mon 23-08-10 15:11:29, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:03:47 +0200
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> 
> > So do
> > you think that we should keep __GFP_NOFAIL as long as all callers are not
> > able to handle allocation failures in more reasonable way?
> 
> The concept should be encapsulated in _some_ centralised fashion.
> 
> Helper functions would work as well as __GFP_NOFAIL, and will move any
> runtime cost away from the good code and push it onto the bad code.
  Makes sense. Removed the patch.

  David, could you provide a function for non-failing allocation and then
use this from JBD and whatever else code is also affected? That looks like
a cleaner solution as Andrew points out...

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-23 22:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008161953430.17924@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
2010-08-17  2:58 ` [patch 4/6] jbd: remove dependency on __GFP_NOFAIL David Rientjes
2010-08-17  9:51   ` Jan Kara
2010-08-17 17:48     ` David Rientjes
2010-08-23 19:28     ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-23 22:03       ` Jan Kara
2010-08-23 22:11         ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-23 22:21           ` Jan Kara [this message]
2010-08-23 22:22           ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100823222100.GE3380@quack.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).