linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] ext4: queue conversion after adding to inode's completed IO list
@ 2010-08-06 19:52 Eric Sandeen
  2010-08-06 20:45 ` Jiaying Zhang
  2010-10-07 17:23 ` Eric Sandeen
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2010-08-06 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ext4 development; +Cc: Jiaying Zhang

By queuing the io end on the unwritten workqueue before adding it
to our inode's list of completed IOs, I think we run the risk
of the work getting completed, and the IO freed, before we try
to add it to the inode's i_completed_io_list.

It should be safe to add it to the inode's list of completed
IOs, and -then- queue it for completion, I think.

Thanks to Dave Chinner for pointing out the race.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
---

(At least I think this is right; I haven't actually demonstrated a race...)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 0afc8c1..7f56c48 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -3804,14 +3804,14 @@ static void ext4_end_io_dio(struct kiocb *iocb, loff_t offset,
 	io_end->flag = EXT4_IO_UNWRITTEN;
 	wq = EXT4_SB(io_end->inode->i_sb)->dio_unwritten_wq;
 
-	/* queue the work to convert unwritten extents to written */
-	queue_work(wq, &io_end->work);

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ext4: queue conversion after adding to inode's completed IO list
  2010-08-06 19:52 [PATCH] ext4: queue conversion after adding to inode's completed IO list Eric Sandeen
@ 2010-08-06 20:45 ` Jiaying Zhang
  2010-10-07 17:23 ` Eric Sandeen
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jiaying Zhang @ 2010-08-06 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: ext4 development

Lgtm. Thanks for the fixing patch.

Jiaying

On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> By queuing the io end on the unwritten workqueue before adding it
> to our inode's list of completed IOs, I think we run the risk
> of the work getting completed, and the IO freed, before we try
> to add it to the inode's i_completed_io_list.
>
> It should be safe to add it to the inode's list of completed
> IOs, and -then- queue it for completion, I think.
>
> Thanks to Dave Chinner for pointing out the race.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> (At least I think this is right; I haven't actually demonstrated a race...)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 0afc8c1..7f56c48 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -3804,14 +3804,14 @@ static void ext4_end_io_dio(struct kiocb *iocb, loff_t offset,
>        io_end->flag = EXT4_IO_UNWRITTEN;
>        wq = EXT4_SB(io_end->inode->i_sb)->dio_unwritten_wq;
>
> -       /* queue the work to convert unwritten extents to written */
> -       queue_work(wq, &io_end->work);
> -
>        /* Add the io_end to per-inode completed aio dio list*/
>        ei = EXT4_I(io_end->inode);
>        spin_lock_irqsave(&ei->i_completed_io_lock, flags);
>        list_add_tail(&io_end->list, &ei->i_completed_io_list);
>        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ei->i_completed_io_lock, flags);
> +
> +       /* queue the work to convert unwritten extents to written */
> +       queue_work(wq, &io_end->work);
>        iocb->private = NULL;
>  out:
>        if (is_async)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ext4: queue conversion after adding to inode's completed IO list
  2010-08-06 19:52 [PATCH] ext4: queue conversion after adding to inode's completed IO list Eric Sandeen
  2010-08-06 20:45 ` Jiaying Zhang
@ 2010-10-07 17:23 ` Eric Sandeen
  2010-10-09 23:14   ` Ted Ts'o
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2010-10-07 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ext4 development; +Cc: Jiaying Zhang

On 08/06/2010 02:52 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> By queuing the io end on the unwritten workqueue before adding it
> to our inode's list of completed IOs, I think we run the risk
> of the work getting completed, and the IO freed, before we try
> to add it to the inode's i_completed_io_list.
> 
> It should be safe to add it to the inode's list of completed
> IOs, and -then- queue it for completion, I think.

Ping? would be good to fix this race, this has jiaying's ack too.

> Thanks to Dave Chinner for pointing out the race.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> ---
> 
> (At least I think this is right; I haven't actually demonstrated a race...)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 0afc8c1..7f56c48 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -3804,14 +3804,14 @@ static void ext4_end_io_dio(struct kiocb *iocb, loff_t offset,
>  	io_end->flag = EXT4_IO_UNWRITTEN;
>  	wq = EXT4_SB(io_end->inode->i_sb)->dio_unwritten_wq;
>  
> -	/* queue the work to convert unwritten extents to written */
> -	queue_work(wq, &io_end->work);
> -
>  	/* Add the io_end to per-inode completed aio dio list*/
>  	ei = EXT4_I(io_end->inode);
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&ei->i_completed_io_lock, flags);
>  	list_add_tail(&io_end->list, &ei->i_completed_io_list);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ei->i_completed_io_lock, flags);
> +
> +	/* queue the work to convert unwritten extents to written */
> +	queue_work(wq, &io_end->work);
>  	iocb->private = NULL;
>  out:
>  	if (is_async)
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ext4: queue conversion after adding to inode's completed IO list
  2010-10-07 17:23 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2010-10-09 23:14   ` Ted Ts'o
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ted Ts'o @ 2010-10-09 23:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: ext4 development, Jiaying Zhang

On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 12:23:56PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 08/06/2010 02:52 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > By queuing the io end on the unwritten workqueue before adding it
> > to our inode's list of completed IOs, I think we run the risk
> > of the work getting completed, and the IO freed, before we try
> > to add it to the inode's i_completed_io_list.
> > 
> > It should be safe to add it to the inode's list of completed
> > IOs, and -then- queue it for completion, I think.
> 
> Ping? would be good to fix this race, this has jiaying's ack too.

Added to the ext4 patch queue, thanks for the ping.

      	     	  	       	      	      - Ted

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-10-09 23:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-08-06 19:52 [PATCH] ext4: queue conversion after adding to inode's completed IO list Eric Sandeen
2010-08-06 20:45 ` Jiaying Zhang
2010-10-07 17:23 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-10-09 23:14   ` Ted Ts'o

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).