From: Bernd Schubert <bs_lists@aakef.fastmail.fm>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com>
Subject: ext4_clear_journal_err: Filesystem error recorded from previous mount: IO failure
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:33:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201010221533.29194.bs_lists@aakef.fastmail.fm> (raw)
Hi all,
is is really a good idea to allow the filesystem to mount if something like
that comes up? I really would prefer if mount would abort.
Oct 22 12:37:36 vm7 kernel: [ 1227.814294] LDISKFS-fs warning (device sfa0074): ldiskfs_clear_journal_err: Filesystem error recorded from p
revious mount: IO failure
Oct 22 12:37:36 vm7 kernel: [ 1227.814314] LDISKFS-fs warning (device sfa0074): ldiskfs_clear_journal_err: Marking fs in need of filesystem
check.
(please ignore "ldiskfs", it was just renamed to that by Lustre, but is
ext4 based as in RHEL5.5, so 2.6.32-ish).
I'm testing with a DDN prototype storage system, which still has some issues
and IO errors come up on certain storage side operations.
We have pacemaker resource agent, that already refuses mount to mount,
if the superblock has the error flag. But obviously that cannot work,
if the flag is only set at mount time. The device was mounted read-only before,
but somehow no error flag was set in the superblock
Oct 22 12:10:39 vm7 kernel: [55827.998615] LDISKFS-fs (sfa0074): Remounting filesystem read-only
Oct 22 12:10:39 vm7 kernel: [55827.998619] LustreError: 2569:0:(filter.c:190:filter_finish_transno()) wrote trans 416613470762 for client 9
c62eca5-08e4-d60d-9883-2a2140085b6c at #15: err = -30
Other devices that also have been mounted read-only do get the flag
however. Maybe it couldn't set the flag due to the IO error?
Thanks,
Bernd
--
Bernd Schubert
DataDirect Networks
next reply other threads:[~2010-10-22 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-22 13:33 Bernd Schubert [this message]
2010-10-22 17:25 ` ext4_clear_journal_err: Filesystem error recorded from previous mount: IO failure Ted Ts'o
2010-10-22 17:42 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-22 18:32 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-10-22 18:54 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-23 16:00 ` Amir Goldstein
2010-10-23 17:46 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-23 22:26 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-10-23 23:56 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-24 0:20 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-24 1:08 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-10-24 14:42 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-23 22:17 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-10-24 8:50 ` Amir Goldstein
2010-10-24 13:55 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-24 14:30 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-24 15:20 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-24 15:39 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-24 15:49 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-24 16:16 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-24 16:43 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-25 10:14 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-10-25 11:45 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-25 12:54 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-25 14:57 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-10-25 19:49 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-25 20:08 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-25 20:10 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-25 19:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-10-25 20:37 ` Bernd Schubert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201010221533.29194.bs_lists@aakef.fastmail.fm \
--to=bs_lists@aakef.fastmail.fm \
--cc=bschubert@ddn.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).