From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Bernd Schubert <bs_lists@aakef.fastmail.fm>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com>
Subject: Re: ext4_clear_journal_err: Filesystem error recorded from previous mount: IO failure
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:25:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101022172536.GP3127@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201010221533.29194.bs_lists@aakef.fastmail.fm>
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 03:33:29PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>
> is is really a good idea to allow the filesystem to mount if something like
> that comes up? I really would prefer if mount would abort.
>
> Oct 22 12:37:36 vm7 kernel: [ 1227.814294] LDISKFS-fs warning (device sfa0074): ldiskfs_clear_journal_err: Filesystem error recorded from p
> revious mount: IO failure
> Oct 22 12:37:36 vm7 kernel: [ 1227.814314] LDISKFS-fs warning (device sfa0074): ldiskfs_clear_journal_err: Marking fs in need of filesystem
> check.
>
> (please ignore "ldiskfs", it was just renamed to that by Lustre, but is
> ext4 based as in RHEL5.5, so 2.6.32-ish).
Did you try running e2fsck first? If it detects the error after
running the journal, it will run the file system check right then and
there. If it doesn't, it's a bug. If you're not running e2fsck
first, and the filesystem had previously detected inconsistencies, the
long-standing tradition is to allow that, since root should know what
it's doing.
And there are times when you do want to mount a filesystem with known
errors; for example, in the case of the root file system, we have
always allowed a read-only mount to continue, so that we can run
e2fsck without requiring a rescue CD 99% of the time.
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-22 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-22 13:33 ext4_clear_journal_err: Filesystem error recorded from previous mount: IO failure Bernd Schubert
2010-10-22 17:25 ` Ted Ts'o [this message]
2010-10-22 17:42 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-22 18:32 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-10-22 18:54 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-23 16:00 ` Amir Goldstein
2010-10-23 17:46 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-23 22:26 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-10-23 23:56 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-24 0:20 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-24 1:08 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-10-24 14:42 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-23 22:17 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-10-24 8:50 ` Amir Goldstein
2010-10-24 13:55 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-24 14:30 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-24 15:20 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-24 15:39 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-24 15:49 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-24 16:16 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-24 16:43 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-25 10:14 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-10-25 11:45 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-25 12:54 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-25 14:57 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-10-25 19:49 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-25 20:08 ` Bernd Schubert
2010-10-25 20:10 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-10-25 19:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-10-25 20:37 ` Bernd Schubert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101022172536.GP3127@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=bs_lists@aakef.fastmail.fm \
--cc=bschubert@ddn.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).