* EXT4-fs (dm-0): unsupported inode size: 0
@ 2010-11-02 13:29 Pol Hallen
2010-11-02 14:22 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-11-02 14:31 ` Ted Ts'o
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pol Hallen @ 2010-11-02 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
Hi folks :-)
on a backup usb disk I've formatted ext4 (debian stable, kernel (2.6.32
vanilla).
Later sometimes when i try to mount this disk in syslog I see:
EXT4-fs (dm-0): unsupported inode size: 0
the health how disk is good..
tune2fs -l /dev/disk is:
tune2fs 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
tune2fs: Filesystem revision too high while trying to open /dev/mapper/pp
Couldn't find valid filesystem superblock.
what is the problem? Is an ext4 problem?
what can I do to fix the problem?
thanks :-)
Pol
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: EXT4-fs (dm-0): unsupported inode size: 0
2010-11-02 13:29 EXT4-fs (dm-0): unsupported inode size: 0 Pol Hallen
@ 2010-11-02 14:22 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-11-02 14:31 ` Ted Ts'o
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2010-11-02 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pol Hallen; +Cc: linux-ext4
On 11/2/10 8:29 AM, Pol Hallen wrote:
> Hi folks :-)
>
> on a backup usb disk I've formatted ext4 (debian stable, kernel (2.6.32
> vanilla).
>
> Later sometimes when i try to mount this disk in syslog I see:
>
> EXT4-fs (dm-0): unsupported inode size: 0
>
> the health how disk is good..
>
> tune2fs -l /dev/disk is:
>
> tune2fs 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
> tune2fs: Filesystem revision too high while trying to open /dev/mapper/pp
> Couldn't find valid filesystem superblock.
>
> what is the problem? Is an ext4 problem?
Seems the disk is badly corrupted.
What does blkid /dev/mapper/pp say? Maybe it's got something besides
ext4 on it now.
-Eric
> what can I do to fix the problem?
> thanks :-)
>
> Pol
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: EXT4-fs (dm-0): unsupported inode size: 0
2010-11-02 13:29 EXT4-fs (dm-0): unsupported inode size: 0 Pol Hallen
2010-11-02 14:22 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2010-11-02 14:31 ` Ted Ts'o
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ted Ts'o @ 2010-11-02 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pol Hallen; +Cc: linux-ext4
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 02:29:06PM +0100, Pol Hallen wrote:
> Hi folks :-)
>
> on a backup usb disk I've formatted ext4 (debian stable, kernel (2.6.32
> vanilla).
>
> Later sometimes when i try to mount this disk in syslog I see:
>
> EXT4-fs (dm-0): unsupported inode size: 0
>
> the health how disk is good..
>
> tune2fs -l /dev/disk is:
>
> tune2fs 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
> tune2fs: Filesystem revision too high while trying to open /dev/mapper/pp
> Couldn't find valid filesystem superblock.
>
> what is the problem? Is an ext4 problem?
Sounds like your superblock got corrupted in an interesting way. Try
"e2fsck -b 32768 /dev/disk".
- Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: EXT4-fs (dm-0): unsupported inode size: 0
@ 2010-11-03 12:37 Pol Hallen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pol Hallen @ 2010-11-03 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
> What does blkid /dev/mapper/pp say? Maybe it's got something besides
> ext4 on it now.
/dev/mapper/pp: UUID="cfbe4076-753a-4d3c-9b9d-e18c6e0f2957" TYPE="ext4"
/dev/sdb1: UUID="a805e772-0bca-4f4c-ad60-f3d0eaf2cc32" TYPE="crypto_LUKS"
Pol
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: EXT4-fs (dm-0): unsupported inode size: 0
@ 2010-11-03 12:38 Pol Hallen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pol Hallen @ 2010-11-03 12:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
> Sounds like your superblock got corrupted in an interesting way. Try
> "e2fsck -b 32768 /dev/disk".
exactly :-( but why?
This disk is perfect (almost.. I thinked :-)
smart monitor said is ok (smartmontools)
with you advice, after some time:
Error deallocating inode 21637778: Illegal doubly indirect block found
e2fsck: aborted
and now?
is a ext4 bug?
I used this disk 3 times..
Pol
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-11-03 12:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-11-02 13:29 EXT4-fs (dm-0): unsupported inode size: 0 Pol Hallen
2010-11-02 14:22 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-11-02 14:31 ` Ted Ts'o
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-03 12:37 Pol Hallen
2010-11-03 12:38 Pol Hallen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).