From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wu Fengguang Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix redirty_page_for_writepage() typo in comment Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:23:29 +0800 Message-ID: <20101111112329.GA6923@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" , LKML To: Trivial Patch Monkey Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:65200 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755560Ab0KKLXb (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Nov 2010 06:23:31 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang --- diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c index 1916164..b82fbd9 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c @@ -3357,7 +3357,7 @@ int ext4_alloc_da_blocks(struct inode *inode) * doing I/O at all. * * We could call write_cache_pages(), and then redirty all of - * the pages by calling redirty_page_for_writeback() but that + * the pages by calling redirty_page_for_writepage() but that * would be ugly in the extreme. So instead we would need to * replicate parts of the code in the above functions, * simplifying them becuase we wouldn't actually intend to