From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Don't remove the "minixdf" mount option
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:42:28 -0500
Message-ID: <20101118014228.GO3290@thunk.org>
References: <4CC755E0.6090205@wencl.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
To: Michal Wencl <michal.wencl@wencl.net>
Return-path: <linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from THUNK.ORG ([69.25.196.29]:48991 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751790Ab0KRBm3 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:42:29 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4CC755E0.6090205@wencl.net>
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:27:44AM +0200, Michal Wencl wrote:
> 
> I'd just like to ask you for not removing the "minixdf" mount option
> for ext4. I find it useful.

Out of curiosity, why do you find it useful?  I just want to
understand the use case.

Thanks, regards,

					- Ted