From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: skip orphan cleanup on rocompat fs
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:54:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110228055407.GS2924@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim6518pCpdndhkEmKuH09Q4K6qX4kF=MEMNCR4Q@mail.gmail.com>
I've applied the patch, with a few cosmetic changes and clarifications
in the commit description to make things easier to understand.
- Ted
>From d39195c33bb1b5fdcb0f416e8a0b34bfdb07a027 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:53:45 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: skip orphan cleanup if fs has unknown ROCOMPAT features
Orphan cleanup is currently executed even if the file system has some
number of unknown ROCOMPAT features, which deletes inodes and frees
blocks, which could be very bad for some RO_COMPAT features,
especially the SNAPSHOT feature.
This patch skips the orphan cleanup if it contains readonly compatible
features not known by this ext4 implementation, which would prevent
the fs from being mounted (or remounted) readwrite.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@users.sf.net>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
---
fs/ext4/super.c | 8 ++++++++
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index bd6e86a..9eaec22 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ static void ext4_write_super(struct super_block *sb);
static int ext4_freeze(struct super_block *sb);
static struct dentry *ext4_mount(struct file_system_type *fs_type, int flags,
const char *dev_name, void *data);
+static int ext4_feature_set_ok(struct super_block *sb, int readonly);
static void ext4_destroy_lazyinit_thread(void);
static void ext4_unregister_li_request(struct super_block *sb);
static void ext4_clear_request_list(void);
@@ -2117,6 +2118,13 @@ static void ext4_orphan_cleanup(struct super_block *sb,
return;
}
+ /* Check if feature set would not allow a r/w mount */
+ if (!ext4_feature_set_ok(sb, 0)) {
+ ext4_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, "Skipping orphan cleanup due to "
+ "unknown ROCOMPAT features");
+ return;
+ }
+
if (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mount_state & EXT4_ERROR_FS) {
if (es->s_last_orphan)
jbd_debug(1, "Errors on filesystem, "
--
1.7.3.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-28 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-26 20:35 [PATCH] ext4: skip orphan cleanup on rocompat fs Amir Goldstein
2011-02-28 5:54 ` Ted Ts'o [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110228055407.GS2924@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).