linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl>
Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext3: skip orphan cleanup on rocompat fs
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:22:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110228182201.GE20805@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110228101454.GE4834@bitwizard.nl>

On Mon 28-02-11 11:14:55, Rogier Wolff wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:40:19PM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > This patch skips the orphan cleanup if readonly compatible features
> > would prevent the fs from being mounted (or remounted) readwrite.
> 
> I use the "mount readonly" option to, for instance, view/check the
> filesystem to determine wether or not I need to fsck first. I use the
> "readonly" feature to prevent the mounting to be a mistake-prone
> situation. It prevents e.g. applications from dropping temporary files
> in my current directory.
> 
> Every time fsck or such a cleanup does something, there is the option
> of the cleanup or fixup being wrong. When you honour the "readonly"
> request from the user, the careful user can go back to the situation
> where he/she started.
> 
> If the cleanup/fixup is really neccesary, do so in in-core buffers of
  Mounting (even read-only) without recovering the journal will give you a
view of a corrupted filesystem. Usually not what you want (although I agree
with you that there are occasions where this *is* what you want).

> the filesystem. Write the infrastructure that allows us to have dirty
> buffers that MAY NOT (yet?!?) be written to the device. This will also
> solve the problem of journal recovery on readonly mount of a root
> filesystem. when it has been fscked, and it's remounted rw, we can
> remove the ban on the writeback of the dirty buffers.
  Yes, this would be a nice feature but noone ever got to implementing it.
You are welcome to contribute it :).

> So I stronly disagree with your patch: It should not only prevent the
> cleanup when writing is not allows due to ro-compat situation, but
> also when requested by the user.
  As Amir said, the patch is trivial and a clear improvement. So it goes
in.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-28 18:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-26 20:40 [PATCH] ext3: skip orphan cleanup on rocompat fs Amir Goldstein
2011-02-28 10:14 ` Rogier Wolff
2011-02-28 13:10   ` Amir Goldstein
2011-02-28 18:22   ` Jan Kara [this message]
2011-02-28 18:49     ` Ted Ts'o
2011-02-28 19:32       ` Jan Kara
2011-02-28 19:05     ` Eric Sandeen
2011-02-28 18:22   ` Ted Ts'o
2011-02-28 18:09 ` Jan Kara
2011-03-24 10:34   ` Amir Goldstein
2011-03-24 16:07     ` [stable] " Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110228182201.GE20805@quack.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).