linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ext3: Implement delayed allocation on page_mkwrite time
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 14:12:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110502141230.4a7640f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1304369816-14545-5-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>

On Mon,  2 May 2011 22:56:56 +0200
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:

> So far, ext3 was allocating necessary blocks for mmapped writes when
> writepage() was called. There are several issues with this. The worst
> being that user is allowed to arbitrarily exceed disk quotas because
> writepage() is called from flusher thread context (which is root) and thus
> quota limits are ignored. Another bad consequence is that data is just lost
> if we find there's no space on the filesystem during ->writepage() time.
> 
> We solve these issues by implementing block reservation in page_mkwrite()
> callback. We don't want to really allocate blocks on page_mkwrite() time
> because for random writes via mmap (as seen for example with applications using
> BerkeleyDB) it results in much more fragmented files and thus much worse
> performance. So we allocate indirect blocks and reserve space for data block in
> page_mkwrite() and do the allocation of data block from writepage().

Yes, instantiating the metadata and accounting the data is a good
approach.  The file layout will be a bit suboptimal, but surely that
will be a minor thing.

But boy, it's a complicated patch!  Are we really sure that we want to
make changes this extensive to our antiquated old fs?  Or do we just
say "yeah, it's broken with quotas - use ext4"?


  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-02 21:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-02 20:56 [PATCH 0/4] Block reservation on page fault time for ext3 Jan Kara
2011-05-02 20:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] vfs: Unmap underlying metadata of new data buffers only when buffer is mapped Jan Kara
2011-05-02 20:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] ext3: Implement per-cpu counters for delayed allocation Jan Kara
2011-05-02 21:08   ` Andrew Morton
2011-05-02 20:56 ` [PATCH 4/4] ext3: Implement delayed allocation on page_mkwrite time Jan Kara
2011-05-02 21:12   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-05-02 22:20     ` Jan Kara
2011-05-02 22:29       ` Andrew Morton
2011-05-03 17:09         ` Jan Kara
2011-05-11 15:38           ` Jan Kara
2011-05-11 19:52             ` Andrew Morton
2011-05-03 10:39       ` Amir Goldstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110502141230.4a7640f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).