From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ted Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ext4: fix possible use-after-free ext4_remove_li_request() Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 13:39:46 -0400 Message-ID: <20110520173946.GB29282@thunk.org> References: <1304956630-20384-1-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com> <1304956630-20384-4-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com> <4DD57827.9060104@redhat.com> <20110520160313.GA29282@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Eric Sandeen , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Lukas Czerner Return-path: Received: from li9-11.members.linode.com ([67.18.176.11]:58016 "EHLO test.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751268Ab1ETRju (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 May 2011 13:39:50 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 06:16:34PM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote: > > I already did send it as a separate patch series with the version > description. What, you mean the -v2 patch series? But Eric has made further suggestions where you said you might try to do more work. Or did I misread the mail thread? This is why I hate it when you reply to the mail thread with an updated patch. It makes it very hard to figure out what's going on.... So let me rephrase the question: Is -v2 your final answer? - Ted