From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar@gmail.com>
Cc: jack@suse.cz, tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
mfasheh@suse.com, jlbec@evilplan.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] jbd2: Add extra parameter in start_this_handle() to control allocation flags.
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 13:22:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110531112253.GD5614@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1306563657-4334-1-git-send-email-mkatiyar@gmail.com>
On Fri 27-05-11 23:20:57, Manish Katiyar wrote:
> changes from v1 -> v2 :
> *) Update start_this_handle to take extra parameter to specify whether
> to retry the allocation or not.
> *) Added jbd allocation flags for callers to control the transaction allocation
> behavior. Callers can pass JBD2_TOPLEVEL if allocation needs to be done using GFP_KERNEL.
The above changelog should be below where (*) is.
Also - this is mainly for Ted: I've looked at where we JBD2_TOPLEVEL could
actually be enabled and the results are: Pretty much nowhere.
The problem is that with ext4, we need i_mutex in io completion path to
end page writeback. So we cannot do GFP_KERNEL allocation whenever we hold
i_mutex because mm might wait in direct reclaim for IO to complete and that
cannot happen until we release i_mutex. And pretty much every write path in
ext4 holds i_mutex.
So JBD2_TOPLEVEL looks like a useless excercise to me and I'd just don't do
it.
> Pass extra flags in journal routines to specify if its ok to
> fail in the journal transaction allocation. Passing JBD2_FAIL_OK means caller is
> ok with journal start failures and can handle ENOMEM.
>
> Update ocfs2 and ext4 routines to pass JBD2_NO_FAIL for the updated journal
> interface by default, to retain the existing behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h | 2 +-
> fs/ext4/super.c | 2 +-
> fs/jbd2/transaction.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++----------------------------
> fs/ocfs2/journal.c | 8 ++++----
> include/linux/jbd2.h | 13 +++++++++----
> 5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
(*) HERE
> +/* JBD2 transaction allocation flags */
> +#define JBD2_NO_FAIL 0x00000001
> +#define JBD2_FAIL_OK 0x00000002
> +#define JBD2_TOPLEVEL 0x00000004
> +
I guess there's no need for JBD2_FAIL_OK - if NOFAIL is not set, we can
fail. Otherwise the patch looks OK.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-31 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-28 6:16 [PATCH v2 1/3] ext4: Fix missing acl release in error path in acl.c Manish Katiyar
2011-05-28 6:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] jbd2: Add extra parameter in start_this_handle() to control allocation flags Manish Katiyar
2011-05-31 11:22 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2011-05-31 22:27 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-06-02 9:54 ` Jan Kara
2011-06-06 0:12 ` Manish Katiyar
2011-06-06 3:21 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-06-08 14:10 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-06-17 6:32 ` Manish Katiyar
2011-06-20 14:32 ` Jan Kara
2011-06-20 14:40 ` Manish Katiyar
2011-06-20 17:57 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-06-20 18:08 ` Manish Katiyar
2011-05-28 6:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ext4: Fix ext4 to use pass jbd allocation flags if they can handle ENOMEM Manish Katiyar
2011-05-31 12:10 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110531112253.GD5614@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
--cc=mkatiyar@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).