From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ted Ts'o Subject: Re: big allocation status Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:38:05 -0400 Message-ID: <20110604033805.GD2614@thunk.org> References: <4DE83F83.6070302@tao.ma> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: ext4 development To: Tao Ma Return-path: Received: from li9-11.members.linode.com ([67.18.176.11]:54887 "EHLO test.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753823Ab1FDDiJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:38:09 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DE83F83.6070302@tao.ma> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 09:57:23AM +0800, Tao Ma wrote: > Hi Ted, > > Do you have any new branch or patch set that can be used for testing > about big allocation? The latest patch set in the mailist is what you > have sent at the beginning of May. Do you have an updated one? We will > try to test it soon and it would grateful if we are on the same page. There is a patch set available at: git://repo.or.cz/ext4-patch-queue.git The bigalloc patches are after the stable-boundary, and will apply against 3.0-rc1. Note that I've fixed them up so that they apply on top of the punch changes; however, the punch ioctl will not work correctly if bigalloc is enabled, since that hasn't been fixed up yet. Also, I'm still working on the e2fsprogs support. - Ted