From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ted Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH] jbd2: Fix oops in jbd2_journal_remove_journal_head() Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:41:13 -0400 Message-ID: <20110612214113.GD2662@thunk.org> References: <1306768378-27748-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> <20110606141630.GK7180@thunk.org> <20110608193142.GH5361@quack.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Kara Return-path: Received: from li9-11.members.linode.com ([67.18.176.11]:56628 "EHLO test.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753302Ab1FLVlR (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:41:17 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110608193142.GH5361@quack.suse.cz> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 09:31:42PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Mon 06-06-11 10:16:30, Ted Tso wrote: > > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 05:12:58PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > > /* > > > - * For the unlocked version of this call, also make sure that any > > > - * hanging journal_head is cleaned up if necessary. > > > + * For the unlocked version of this call, also drop buffer_head reference. > > > * > > > * __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer is usually called as part of a single locked > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > Doesn't this paragraph refer to jbd2_journal_refile_buffer(), not > > __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer()? Or am I missing something? > Hmm, the comment seems to be wrong. The comment about buffer_head > reference does not apply anymore. I'll fix that. Are you going to be sending me a new version of this patch with this comment fixed? Or should I just remove it? Thanks, - Ted