linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Maxim Patlasov <maxim.patlasov@gmail.com>
Cc: adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: ext4_free_blocks() fix
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 19:39:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110710233940.GA28763@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinZ5Lw0R9Nf1Un_gEA8DZqo7y15TA@mail.gmail.com>

Applied to the ext4 tree, with the following changes:

1)  I made the one-line summary clearer:

    ext4: fix i_blocks/quota accounting when extent insertion fails

2) I used the flag name EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_NO_QUOT_UPDATE which was
clearer than "..._SKIP_QUPD".

Apologies for the delay in getting back to you, and thanks for the
patch.

	      	  	   	   	   - Ted

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 02:17:30PM +0400, Maxim Patlasov wrote:
> I apologise for flooding, patch description in former email was for
> slightly different kernel version. Correct description is below:
> 
> Existent implementation of ext4_free_blocks() always calls dquot_free_block
> This looks quite sensible in the most cases: blocks to be freed are associated
> with inode and were accounted in quota and i_blocks some time ago.
> 
> However, there is a case when blocks to free were not accounted by the time
> calling ext4_free_blocks() yet:
> 
> 1. delalloc is on, write_begin pre-allocated some space in quota
> 2. write-back happens, ext4 allocates some blocks in ext4_ext_map_blocks()
> 3. then ext4_ext_map_blocks() gets an error (e.g.  ENOSPC) from
>    ext4_ext_insert_extent() and calls ext4_free_blocks().
> 
> In this scenario, ext4_free_blocks() calls dquot_free_block() who, in turn,
> decrements i_blocks for blocks which were not accounted yet (due to delalloc)
> After clean umount, e2fsck reports something like:
> 
> > Inode 21, i_blocks is 5080, should be 5128.  Fix<y>?
> because i_blocks was erroneously decremented as explained above.
> 
> The patch fixes the problem by passing EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_SKIP_QUPD flag to
> ext4_free_blocks(). This flag forces ext4_free_blocks() to skip
> dquot_free_block() call.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Patlasov <maxim.patlasov@gmail.com>

      reply	other threads:[~2011-07-10 23:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-10 10:07 [PATCH] ext4: ext4_free_blocks() fix Maxim Patlasov
2011-06-10 10:17 ` Maxim Patlasov
2011-07-10 23:39   ` Ted Ts'o [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110710233940.GA28763@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxim.patlasov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).