linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/3] ext4: remove unused argument in ext4_ext_next_leaf_block
@ 2011-07-22  2:23 Robin Dong
  2011-07-22  2:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] ext4: correct the debug message in ext4_ext_insert_extent Robin Dong
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Robin Dong @ 2011-07-22  2:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-ext4; +Cc: Robin Dong

From: Robin Dong <sanbai@taobao.com>

The argument "inode" in function ext4_ext_next_allocated_block looks useless,
so clean it.

Signed-off-by: Robin Dong <sanbai@taobao.com>
---
 fs/ext4/extents.c |    5 ++---
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index eb63c7b..3966839 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -1447,8 +1447,7 @@ ext4_ext_next_allocated_block(struct ext4_ext_path *path)
  * ext4_ext_next_leaf_block:
  * returns first allocated block from next leaf or EXT_MAX_BLOCKS
  */
-static ext4_lblk_t ext4_ext_next_leaf_block(struct inode *inode,
-					struct ext4_ext_path *path)
+static ext4_lblk_t ext4_ext_next_leaf_block(struct ext4_ext_path *path)
 {
 	int depth;
 
@@ -1766,7 +1765,7 @@ repeat:
 
 	/* probably next leaf has space for us? */
 	fex = EXT_LAST_EXTENT(eh);
-	next = ext4_ext_next_leaf_block(inode, path);
+	next = ext4_ext_next_leaf_block(path);
 	if (le32_to_cpu(newext->ee_block) > le32_to_cpu(fex->ee_block)
 	    && next != EXT_MAX_BLOCKS) {
 		ext_debug("next leaf block - %d\n", next);
-- 
1.7.4.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/3] ext4: correct the debug message in ext4_ext_insert_extent
  2011-07-22  2:23 [PATCH 1/3] ext4: remove unused argument in ext4_ext_next_leaf_block Robin Dong
@ 2011-07-22  2:23 ` Robin Dong
  2011-07-24  1:55   ` Ted Ts'o
  2011-07-22  2:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] ext4: correct comment for ext4_ext_check_cache Robin Dong
  2011-07-24  1:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] ext4: remove unused argument in ext4_ext_next_leaf_block Ted Ts'o
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Robin Dong @ 2011-07-22  2:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-ext4; +Cc: Robin Dong

From: Robin Dong <sanbai@taobao.com>

The debug message in ext4_ext_insert_extent before moving extent
is incorrect (the "from xx to xx").

Signed-off-by: Robin Dong <sanbai@taobao.com>
---
 fs/ext4/extents.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index 3966839..a4d6216 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -1839,7 +1839,7 @@ has_space:
 				ext4_ext_pblock(newext),
 				ext4_ext_is_uninitialized(newext),
 				ext4_ext_get_actual_len(newext),
-				nearex, len, nearex + 1, nearex + 2);
+				nearex, len, nearex, nearex + 1);
 		memmove(nearex + 1, nearex, len);
 		path[depth].p_ext = nearex;
 	}
-- 
1.7.4.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] ext4: correct comment for ext4_ext_check_cache
  2011-07-22  2:23 [PATCH 1/3] ext4: remove unused argument in ext4_ext_next_leaf_block Robin Dong
  2011-07-22  2:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] ext4: correct the debug message in ext4_ext_insert_extent Robin Dong
@ 2011-07-22  2:23 ` Robin Dong
  2011-07-24  1:55   ` Ted Ts'o
  2011-07-24  1:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] ext4: remove unused argument in ext4_ext_next_leaf_block Ted Ts'o
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Robin Dong @ 2011-07-22  2:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-ext4; +Cc: Robin Dong

From: Robin Dong <sanbai@taobao.com>

The comment for ext4_ext_check_cache has a litte mistake.

Signed-off-by: Robin Dong <sanbai@taobao.com>
---
 fs/ext4/extents.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index a4d6216..cb8285d 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -2052,7 +2052,7 @@ ext4_ext_put_gap_in_cache(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_ext_path *path,
 }
 
 /*
- * ext4_ext_in_cache()
+ * ext4_ext_check_cache()
  * Checks to see if the given block is in the cache.
  * If it is, the cached extent is stored in the given
  * cache extent pointer.  If the cached extent is a hole,
-- 
1.7.4.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/3] ext4: remove unused argument in ext4_ext_next_leaf_block
  2011-07-22  2:23 [PATCH 1/3] ext4: remove unused argument in ext4_ext_next_leaf_block Robin Dong
  2011-07-22  2:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] ext4: correct the debug message in ext4_ext_insert_extent Robin Dong
  2011-07-22  2:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] ext4: correct comment for ext4_ext_check_cache Robin Dong
@ 2011-07-24  1:55 ` Ted Ts'o
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ted Ts'o @ 2011-07-24  1:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Robin Dong; +Cc: linux-ext4, Robin Dong

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:23:39AM +0800, Robin Dong wrote:
> From: Robin Dong <sanbai@taobao.com>
> 
> The argument "inode" in function ext4_ext_next_allocated_block looks useless,
> so clean it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robin Dong <sanbai@taobao.com>

Thanks, added to the ext4 tree.

					- Ted

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/3] ext4: correct the debug message in ext4_ext_insert_extent
  2011-07-22  2:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] ext4: correct the debug message in ext4_ext_insert_extent Robin Dong
@ 2011-07-24  1:55   ` Ted Ts'o
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ted Ts'o @ 2011-07-24  1:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Robin Dong; +Cc: linux-ext4, Robin Dong

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:23:40AM +0800, Robin Dong wrote:
> From: Robin Dong <sanbai@taobao.com>
> 
> The debug message in ext4_ext_insert_extent before moving extent
> is incorrect (the "from xx to xx").
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robin Dong <sanbai@taobao.com>

Thanks, added to the ext4 tree.

					- Ted

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/3] ext4: correct comment for ext4_ext_check_cache
  2011-07-22  2:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] ext4: correct comment for ext4_ext_check_cache Robin Dong
@ 2011-07-24  1:55   ` Ted Ts'o
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ted Ts'o @ 2011-07-24  1:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Robin Dong; +Cc: linux-ext4, Robin Dong

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:23:41AM +0800, Robin Dong wrote:
> From: Robin Dong <sanbai@taobao.com>
> 
> The comment for ext4_ext_check_cache has a litte mistake.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robin Dong <sanbai@taobao.com>

Thanks, added to the ext4 tree.

					- Ted

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-24  1:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-07-22  2:23 [PATCH 1/3] ext4: remove unused argument in ext4_ext_next_leaf_block Robin Dong
2011-07-22  2:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] ext4: correct the debug message in ext4_ext_insert_extent Robin Dong
2011-07-24  1:55   ` Ted Ts'o
2011-07-22  2:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] ext4: correct comment for ext4_ext_check_cache Robin Dong
2011-07-24  1:55   ` Ted Ts'o
2011-07-24  1:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] ext4: remove unused argument in ext4_ext_next_leaf_block Ted Ts'o

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).