From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: xfstests #62 broken on ext4 Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:09:25 -0400 Message-ID: <20110814160925.GA29428@infradead.org> References: <20110813201419.GA6442@infradead.org> <20110814004417.GA3524@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Behrens , xfs@oss.sgi.com To: Ted Ts'o Return-path: Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:35774 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754350Ab1HNQJ3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:09:29 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110814004417.GA3524@thunk.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 08:44:17PM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote: > I see there's an sort command at the very end of _extend_test_bed(), I > presume we should also add a similar "LC_COLLATE=POSIX sort" to the > other "find" command pipelines, and it's easy enough to filter out the > lost+found directory by adding a "! -name lost+found". A patch from you or Stefan would be very welcome. Note that at least for btrfs I see problems with the user.name2 attribute in that test too, so it might be a bit of effort to sort out what actually is going on.