public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jiayingz@google.com (Jiaying Zhang)
To: tytso@mit.edu
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: Flush any pending end_io requests before O_direct read on dioread_nolock
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:28:45 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110819012845.7A4A32012F@ruihe2.smo.corp.google.com> (raw)

There is a race between ext4 buffer write and direct_IO read with
dioread_nolock mount option enabled. The problem is that we clear
PageWriteback flag during end_io time but will do
uninitialized-to-initialized extent conversion later with dioread_nolock.
If an O_direct read request comes in during this period, ext4 will return
zero instead of the recently written data.

This patch checks whether there are any pending uninitialized-to-initialized
extent conversion requests before doing O_direct read to close the race.
Note that this is just a bandaid fix. The fundamental issue is that we
clear PageWriteback flag before we really complete an IO, which is
problem-prone. To fix the fundamental issue, we may need to implement an
extent tree cache that we can use to look up pending to-be-converted extents.

Signed-off-by: Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com>
---
 fs/ext4/indirect.c |    9 +++++++--
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/indirect.c b/fs/ext4/indirect.c
index 6c27111..ca90d73 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/indirect.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/indirect.c
@@ -800,12 +800,17 @@ ssize_t ext4_ind_direct_IO(int rw, struct kiocb *iocb,
 	}
 
 retry:
-	if (rw == READ && ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode))
+	if (rw == READ && ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode)) {
+		if (unlikely(!list_empty(&ei->i_completed_io_list))) {
+			mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
+			ext4_flush_completed_IO(inode);
+			mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
+		}
 		ret = __blockdev_direct_IO(rw, iocb, inode,
 				 inode->i_sb->s_bdev, iov,
 				 offset, nr_segs,
 				 ext4_get_block, NULL, NULL, 0);
-	else {
+	} else {
 		ret = blockdev_direct_IO(rw, iocb, inode,
 				 inode->i_sb->s_bdev, iov,
 				 offset, nr_segs,
-- 
1.7.3.1


             reply	other threads:[~2011-08-19  1:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-19  1:28 Jiaying Zhang [this message]
2011-08-19 20:57 ` [PATCH] ext4: Flush any pending end_io requests before O_direct read on dioread_nolock Ted Ts'o
2011-08-19 21:08   ` Jiaying Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110819012845.7A4A32012F@ruihe2.smo.corp.google.com \
    --to=jiayingz@google.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox