From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Allison Henderson <achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: only call ext4_jbd2_file_inode when an inode has been extended
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:57:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110906155739.GA29735@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110906153601.GA20571@thunk.org>
On Tue 06-09-11 11:36:01, Ted Tso wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 12:02:53PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > That would seem possible as I'm looking e.g. into
> > ext4_convert_unwritten_extents(). But then any waiting for writeback from
> > kjournald is prone to deadlocks. In fact regardless of what kjournald does
> > there does not seem to be sane lock ordering since we have:
> >
> > transaction start -> PageWriteback -> transaction start
> > ^ ^
> > | end_io handling if I'm right
> > enforced by write_cache_pages_da
> >
> > Which is really nasty. We cannot end page writeback until the page is
> > readable from disk which means until we have properly updated extent tree.
> > But for extent tree update we need a transaction. The only way out I can
> > see is to reserve space for extent tree update in a transaction in
> > writepages() and holding the transaction open until end_io time when we
> > change extent tree and close the transaction. But I'm afraid that's going
> > to suck under heavy load...
>
> Yes, that's a problem with ext4_convert_unwritten_extents() being
> called out of end_io handling, and of course dioread_nolock does a lot
> more of that, hence why it shows up in that mode.
>
> I think the long-term solution here is that we have to reserve space
> and make the allocation decision at writepages() time, but we don't
> actually modify any on-disk state, hence we don't have to hold a
> transaction open. We just prevent those disk blocks from getting
> allocated anywhere else, and we tentative assoicate physical blocks
> with the logical block numbers, but in a memory structure only. Then
> when the pages are written, we can drop PageWriteback. We don't have
> to wait until the extent blocks are written to disk, so long as any
> callers of ext4_map_blocks() get the right information (via an
> in-memory cache that we would have to add to make this whole thing
> first), and so long as fsync() not only calls filemap_fdatawrite(),
> but also waits for the metadata updates to the extent tree/indirect
> blocks have been completed.
I have originally disregarded this option because it seemed to fragile.
But as you outline it here, it looks it should be doable.
Honza
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-06 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-06 6:38 [PATCH] ext4: only call ext4_jbd2_file_inode when an inode has been extended Theodore Ts'o
2011-09-06 10:02 ` Jan Kara
2011-09-06 15:36 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-09-06 15:57 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2011-09-15 2:44 ` Yongqiang Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110906155739.GA29735@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).