linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@oracle.com>,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Coly Li <colyli@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/47] e2fsck: Verify and correct inode checksums
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 00:34:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111008073400.17888.93726.stgit@elm3c44.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111008073315.17888.22132.stgit@elm3c44.beaverton.ibm.com>

Detect mismatches of the inode and checksum, and prompt the user to fix the
situation.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com>
---
 e2fsck/pass1.c   |   43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 e2fsck/problem.c |   15 +++++++++++++++
 e2fsck/problem.h |    9 +++++++++
 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)


diff --git a/e2fsck/pass1.c b/e2fsck/pass1.c
index d051703..96f87e8 100644
--- a/e2fsck/pass1.c
+++ b/e2fsck/pass1.c
@@ -540,6 +540,41 @@ extern void e2fsck_setup_tdb_icount(e2fsck_t ctx, int flags,
 		*ret = 0;
 }
 
+static int validate_inode_checksum(ext2_filsys fs,
+				   e2fsck_t ctx,
+				   struct problem_context *pctx,
+				   ext2_ino_t ino,
+				   struct ext2_inode *inode)
+{
+	struct ext2_inode_large *linode = (struct ext2_inode_large *)inode;
+
+	/* Ignore non-Linux filesystems */
+	if (fs->super->s_creator_os != EXT2_OS_LINUX)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Check for invalid inode checksum */
+	if (ext2fs_inode_csum_verify(fs, ino, linode))
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * TODO: Change the following check to use the inode badness patch.
+	 * For the moment we'll just assume that the user wants to clear the
+	 * bad inode.
+	 */
+	if (fix_problem(ctx, PR_1_INODE_CORRUPT, pctx)) {
+		e2fsck_clear_inode(ctx, ino, inode, 0, "pass1");
+		if (ino == EXT2_BAD_INO)
+			ext2fs_mark_inode_bitmap2(ctx->inode_used_map,
+						  ino);
+		return PR_1_INODE_CORRUPT;
+	} else if (fix_problem(ctx, PR_1_INODE_CSUM_INVALID, pctx)) {
+		e2fsck_write_inode(ctx, ino, inode, "pass1");
+		return PR_1_INODE_CSUM_INVALID;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 void e2fsck_pass1(e2fsck_t ctx)
 {
 	int	i;
@@ -717,8 +752,10 @@ void e2fsck_pass1(e2fsck_t ctx)
 				fatal_error(ctx, 0);
 		}
 		old_op = ehandler_operation(_("getting next inode from scan"));
+		ctx->fs->flags |= EXT2_FLAG_IGNORE_CSUM_ERRORS;
 		pctx.errcode = ext2fs_get_next_inode_full(scan, &ino,
 							  inode, inode_size);
+		ctx->fs->flags &= ~EXT2_FLAG_IGNORE_CSUM_ERRORS;
 		ehandler_operation(old_op);
 		if (ctx->flags & E2F_FLAG_SIGNAL_MASK)
 			return;
@@ -750,6 +787,12 @@ void e2fsck_pass1(e2fsck_t ctx)
 			}
 		}
 
+		check_inode_extra_space(ctx, &pctx);
+		/* Validate inode checksum.  i_extra_isize must be sane. */
+		if (validate_inode_checksum(fs, ctx, &pctx, ino, inode) ==
+		    PR_1_INODE_CORRUPT)
+			continue;
+
 		/*
 		 * Test for incorrect extent flag settings.
 		 *
diff --git a/e2fsck/problem.c b/e2fsck/problem.c
index 6ee3fa4..86cd954 100644
--- a/e2fsck/problem.c
+++ b/e2fsck/problem.c
@@ -934,6 +934,21 @@ static struct e2fsck_problem problem_table[] = {
 	/* Quota inode is user visible */
 	{ PR_1_QUOTA_INODE_NOT_HIDDEN,
 	  N_("@q @i is visible to the user.  "),
+	  PROMPT_FIX, PR_PREEN_OK },
+
+	/* inode checksum probably not set */
+	{ PR_1_INODE_CSUM_INVALID,
+	  N_("@i %i checksum incorrect.  "),
+	  PROMPT_FIX, PR_PREEN_OK },
+
+	/* inode checksum probably set, but does not match */
+	{ PR_1_INODE_CORRUPT,
+	  N_("@i %i checksum shows corruption.  "),
+	  PROMPT_CLEAR, PR_PREEN_OK },
+
+	/* inode checksumming disabled, yet checksum is probably set? */
+	{ PR_1_INODE_CSUM_NONZERO,
+	  N_("@i %i checksum should not be set.  "),
 	  PROMPT_CLEAR, PR_PREEN_OK },
 
 	/* Invalid bad inode */
diff --git a/e2fsck/problem.h b/e2fsck/problem.h
index 9db29d8..e1c7f26 100644
--- a/e2fsck/problem.h
+++ b/e2fsck/problem.h
@@ -550,6 +550,15 @@ struct problem_context {
 /* Invalid bad inode */
 #define PR_1_INVALID_BAD_INODE		0x010065
 
+/* inode checksum probably not set */
+#define PR_1_INODE_CSUM_INVALID		0x010066
+
+/* inode checksum probably set, but does not match */
+#define PR_1_INODE_CORRUPT		0x010067
+
+/* inode checksum should not be set */
+#define PR_1_INODE_CSUM_NONZERO		0x010068
+
 /*
  * Pass 1b errors
  */


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-08  7:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-08  7:33 [PATCH v2 00/47] e2fsprogs: Add metadata checksumming Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:33 ` [PATCH 01/47] libext2fs: Read and write full size inodes Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:33 ` [PATCH 02/47] libext2fs: Add metadata checksum flag Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:33 ` [PATCH 03/47] debugfs: Optionally ignore bad checksums Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:33 ` [PATCH 04/47] libext2fs: Add inode checksum support Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:33 ` [PATCH 05/47] debugfs: Dump inode checksum when appropriate Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:33 ` [PATCH 06/47] tune2fs: Add inode checksum support Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:34 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2011-10-08  7:34 ` [PATCH 08/47] mke2fs: Allow metadata checksums to be turned on at mkfs time Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:34 ` [PATCH 09/47] libext2fs: Create the inode bitmap checksum Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:34 ` [PATCH 10/47] tune2fs: Rewrite inode bitmap checksums Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:34 ` [PATCH 11/47] dumpe2fs: Display inode bitmap checksum Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:34 ` [PATCH 12/47] e2fsck: Verify " Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:34 ` [PATCH 13/47] libext2fs: Create the block " Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:34 ` [PATCH 14/47] dumpe2fs: Display " Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:34 ` [PATCH 15/47] e2fsck: Verify " Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:34 ` [PATCH 16/47] e2fsck: Don't verify bitmap checksums Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:35 ` [PATCH 17/47] tune2fs: Rewrite block " Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:35 ` [PATCH 18/47] libext2fs: Verify and calculate extent tree block checksums Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:35 ` [PATCH 19/47] tune2fs: Enable extent tree checksums Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:35 ` [PATCH 20/47] libext2fs: Introduce dx_tail and dir_entry_tail Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:35 ` [PATCH 21/47] debugfs: Print htree internal node checksums Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:35 ` [PATCH 22/47] libext2fs: Add dx_root/dx_node checksum calculation and verification helpers Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:35 ` [PATCH 23/47] e2fsck: Verify htree root/node checksums Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:35 ` [PATCH 24/47] libext2fs: Introduce dir_entry_tail to provide checksums for directory leaf nodes Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:35 ` [PATCH 25/47] e2fsck: Check directory leaf block checksums Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:36 ` [PATCH 26/47] tune2fs: Rebuild and checksum directories when toggling metadata_csum or changing UUID Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:36 ` [PATCH 27/47] libext2fs: Verify and calculate extended attribute block checksums Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:36 ` [PATCH 28/47] e2fsck: Check " Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:36 ` [PATCH 29/47] tune2fs: Rewrite " Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:36 ` [PATCH 30/47] libext2fs: Calculate and verify superblock checksums Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:36 ` [PATCH 31/47] e2fsck: Handle superblock checksum errors gracefully Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:36 ` [PATCH 32/47] libext2fs: Use i_generation in inode-related metadata checksums Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:36 ` [PATCH 33/47] libext2fs: Record the checksum algorithm in use in the superblock Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:36 ` [PATCH 34/47] tune2fs: Store checksum algorithm type in superblock Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:37 ` [PATCH 35/47] mke2fs: Record the checksum algorithm in use in the superblock Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:37 ` [PATCH 36/47] libext2fs: Block group checksum should use metadata_csum algorithm (if feature flag set) Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:37 ` [PATCH 37/47] tune2fs: Rewrite block group checksums when changing bg_use_meta_csum feature Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:37 ` [PATCH 38/47] mke2fs: Warn if not enabling all the features that metadata_csum wants Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:37 ` [PATCH 39/47] libext2fs: Add checksum to MMP block Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:37 ` [PATCH 40/47] e2fsck: Verify and correct MMP checksum problems Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:37 ` [PATCH 41/47] tune2fs: Force MMP update when changing metadata_csum flag Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:37 ` [PATCH 42/47] libext2fs: Add feature flags for jbd2 v2 checksums Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:37 ` [PATCH 43/47] e2fsck: Check journal superblock checksum prior to recovery Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:37 ` [PATCH 44/47] e2fsck: Check revoke block checksum during recovery Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:38 ` [PATCH 45/47] e2fsck: Check descriptor block checksum when recovering journal Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:38 ` [PATCH 46/47] e2fsck: Check commit block checksum during recovery Darrick J. Wong
2011-10-08  7:38 ` [PATCH 47/47] e2fsck: Verify data block checksums when recovering journal Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111008073400.17888.93726.stgit@elm3c44.beaverton.ibm.com \
    --to=djwong@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=colyli@gmail.com \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sunil.mushran@oracle.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).