From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [RFC] Metadata Replication for Ext4 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:54:28 -0400 Message-ID: <20111021155428.GA21564@infradead.org> References: <4EA1952B.9070404@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Aditya Kali , Andreas Dilger , Lukas Czerner , "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" , Nauman Rafique , TheodoreTso , Ric Wheeler , "Alasdair G.Kergon" , Christoph Hellwig To: Eric Sandeen Return-path: Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:49808 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751847Ab1JUPyb (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:54:31 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EA1952B.9070404@redhat.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:52:11AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > With an SSD, you -really- don't know the independent failure domains, > with all the garbage collection & remapping that they may do, right? In fact some popular consumer SSDs do some fairly efficient data de-duplication which completly runs any metadata redundancy on a single of these devices void.