linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
	"xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>,
	"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/5] mm: try to distribute dirty pages fairly across zones
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:33:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111031113321.GA30890@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111028201829.GA20607@localhost>

> //regression
> 3) much increased cpu %user and %system for btrfs

Sorry I find out that the CPU time regressions for btrfs are caused by
some additional trace events enabled on btrfs (for debugging an
unrelated btrfs hang bug) which results in 7 times more trace event
lines:

 2701238 /export/writeback/thresh=1000M/btrfs-1dd-4k-8p-2941M-1000M:10-3.1.0-rc9-ioless-full-nfs-wq5-next-20111014+
19054054 /export/writeback/thresh=1000M/btrfs-1dd-4k-8p-2941M-1000M:10-3.1.0-rc9-ioless-full-per-zone-dirty-next-20111014+

So no real regressions.

Besides, the patchset also performs good on random writes:

3.1.0-rc9-ioless-full-nfs-wq5-next-20111014+  3.1.0-rc9-ioless-full-per-zone-dirty-next-20111014+  
------------------------  ------------------------  
                    1.65        -5.1%         1.57  MMAP-RANDWRITE-4K/btrfs-fio_fat_mmap_randwrite_4k-4k-8p-4096M-20:10-X
                   18.65        -6.4%        17.46  MMAP-RANDWRITE-4K/ext3-fio_fat_mmap_randwrite_4k-4k-8p-4096M-20:10-X
                    2.09        +1.2%         2.12  MMAP-RANDWRITE-4K/ext4-fio_fat_mmap_randwrite_4k-4k-8p-4096M-20:10-X
                    2.49        -0.3%         2.48  MMAP-RANDWRITE-4K/xfs-fio_fat_mmap_randwrite_4k-4k-8p-4096M-20:10-X
                   51.35        +0.0%        51.36  MMAP-RANDWRITE-64K/btrfs-fio_fat_mmap_randwrite_64k-64k-8p-4096M-20:10-X
                   45.20        +0.5%        45.43  MMAP-RANDWRITE-64K/ext3-fio_fat_mmap_randwrite_64k-64k-8p-4096M-20:10-X
                   44.77        +0.7%        45.10  MMAP-RANDWRITE-64K/ext4-fio_fat_mmap_randwrite_64k-64k-8p-4096M-20:10-X
                   45.11        +2.5%        46.23  MMAP-RANDWRITE-64K/xfs-fio_fat_mmap_randwrite_64k-64k-8p-4096M-20:10-X
                  211.31        +0.2%       211.74  TOTAL write_bw

And writes to USB key:

3.1.0-rc9-ioless-full-nfs-wq5-next-20111014+  3.1.0-rc9-ioless-full-per-zone-dirty-next-20111014+  
------------------------  ------------------------  
                    5.94        +0.8%         5.99  UKEY-thresh=1G/btrfs-1dd-4k-8p-4096M-1024M:10-X
                    2.64        -0.8%         2.62  UKEY-thresh=1G/ext3-10dd-4k-8p-4096M-1024M:10-X
                    5.10        +0.3%         5.12  UKEY-thresh=1G/ext3-1dd-4k-8p-4096M-1024M:10-X
                    3.26        -0.8%         3.24  UKEY-thresh=1G/ext3-2dd-4k-8p-4096M-1024M:10-X
                    5.63        -0.5%         5.60  UKEY-thresh=1G/ext4-10dd-4k-8p-4096M-1024M:10-X
                    6.04        -0.1%         6.04  UKEY-thresh=1G/ext4-1dd-4k-8p-4096M-1024M:10-X
                    5.90        -0.2%         5.88  UKEY-thresh=1G/ext4-2dd-4k-8p-4096M-1024M:10-X
                    2.45       +22.6%         3.00  UKEY-thresh=1G/xfs-10dd-4k-8p-4096M-1024M:10-X
                    6.18        -0.4%         6.16  UKEY-thresh=1G/xfs-1dd-4k-8p-4096M-1024M:10-X
                    4.81        +0.0%         4.81  UKEY-thresh=1G/xfs-2dd-4k-8p-4096M-1024M:10-X
                   47.94        +1.1%        48.45  TOTAL write_bw

In summary, I see no problem at all in these trivial writeback tests.

Tested-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>

Thanks,
Fengguang

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-31 11:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-30  7:17 [patch 0/5] per-zone dirty limits v3 Johannes Weiner
2011-09-30  7:17 ` [patch 1/5] mm: exclude reserved pages from dirtyable memory Johannes Weiner
2011-09-30 13:53   ` Michal Hocko
2011-10-01  7:10   ` Minchan Kim
2011-10-03 11:22   ` Mel Gorman
2011-09-30  7:17 ` [patch 2/5] mm: writeback: cleanups in preparation for per-zone dirty limits Johannes Weiner
2011-09-30 13:56   ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-30  7:17 ` [patch 3/5] mm: try to distribute dirty pages fairly across zones Johannes Weiner
2011-09-30  7:35   ` Pekka Enberg
2011-09-30  8:55     ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-30 14:28   ` Michal Hocko
2011-10-28 20:18     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-31 11:33       ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-11-01 10:55         ` Johannes Weiner
     [not found]     ` <20111027155618.GA25524@localhost>
     [not found]       ` <20111027161359.GA1319@redhat.com>
     [not found]         ` <20111027204743.GA19343@localhost>
     [not found]           ` <20111027221258.GA22869@localhost>
     [not found]             ` <20111027231933.GB1319@redhat.com>
2011-10-28 20:39               ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-01 10:52                 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-30  7:17 ` [patch 4/5] mm: filemap: pass __GFP_WRITE from grab_cache_page_write_begin() Johannes Weiner
2011-09-30 14:41   ` Michal Hocko
2011-09-30  7:17 ` [patch 5/5] Btrfs: pass __GFP_WRITE for buffered write page allocations Johannes Weiner
2011-10-03 11:25   ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111031113321.GA30890@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).