From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johann Lombardi Subject: Re: quotacheck on 'tune2fs -O quota' Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 21:38:36 +0100 Message-ID: <20111107203836.GB3191@granier.hd.free.fr> References: <4EB224A9.8030606@whamcloud.com> <20111104090356.GC6205@granier.hd.free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Aditya Kali Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:49016 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753176Ab1KGUmq (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2011 15:42:46 -0500 Received: by wyh15 with SMTP id 15so4905473wyh.19 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 12:42:44 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 09:48:09AM -0700, Aditya Kali wrote: > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Johann Lombardi wrote: > > The old quota files also contain enforcement information which will thus be lost. > > To sum up, there is no way to upgrade without losing all quota limits? > > > I agree it would be useful to allow upgrades using existing quota > files. I just didn't have a way of doing this correctly though so I > had removed it. But this patch fixes it, so I am all for including it. Great, thanks. > Niu, could you please rebase your changes on top of the cleanup > changes that I had sent? Also, I will prefer if you split this patch > into two patches- > 1) to add support for reading existing quota files > 2) do a quota check at tune2fs time Niu has resubmitted the patches. Cheers, Johann