public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>,
	rickyb@google.com, aberkan@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix racy use-after-free in ext4_end_io_dio()
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:18:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111124231848.GC5167@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111124194626.GA5260@google.com>

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:46:26AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> ext4_end_io_dio() queues io_end->work and then clears iocb->private;
> however, io_end->work completes the iocb by calling aio_complete(),
> which may happen before io_end->work clearing thus leading to
> use-after-free.
> 
> Detected and tested with slab poisoning.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Reported-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
> Tested-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org

Thanks!!  I've been trying to track down this bug for a while.  The
repro case I had ran the 12 fio's against 12 different file systems
with the following configuration:

[global]
direct=1
ioengine=libaio
iodepth=1
bs=4k
ba=4k
size=128m

[create]
filename=${TESTDIR}
rw=write

... and would leave a few inodes with elevated i_ioend_counts, which
means any attempt to delete those inodes or to unmount the file system
owning those inodes would hang forever.

With your patch this problem goes away.

>I *think* this is the correct fix but am not too familiar with code
>path, so please proceed with caution.

Looks good to me.  Thanks, applied.

>Thank you.

No, thank *you*!  :-)

					- Ted

P.S.  It would be nice to get this into xfstests, but it requires at
least 10-12 (12 to repro it reliably) HDD's, and a fairly high core
count machine in order to reproduce it.  I played around with trying
to create a reproducer that worked on a smaller number of disks and/or
fio's/CPU's, but I was never able to manage it.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-24 23:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-24 19:46 [PATCH] ext4: fix racy use-after-free in ext4_end_io_dio() Tejun Heo
2011-11-24 23:18 ` Ted Ts'o [this message]
2011-11-24 23:52   ` Kent Overstreet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111124231848.GC5167@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=aberkan@google.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=koverstreet@google.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rickyb@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox