From: Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@opendz.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/ext{3,4}: fix potential race when setversion ioctl updates inode
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 00:14:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120103231432.GA23522@dztty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120103124624.GB31457@quack.suse.cz>
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:46:24PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue 03-01-12 02:31:52, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> >
> > The EXT{3,4}_IOC_SETVERSION ioctl() updates the inode without i_mutex,
> > this can lead to a race with the other operations that update the same
> > inode.
> >
> > Patch tested.
> Thanks for the patch but I don't quite understand the problem.
> i_generation is set when:
> a) inode is loaded from disk
> b) inode is allocated
> c) in SETVERSION ioctl
>
> The only thing that can race here seems to be c) against c) and that is
> racy with i_mutex as well. So what problems do you exactly observe without
> the patch?
Right, but what about the related i_ctime change ? (i_ctime is updated in
other places...)
The i_ctime update must reflect the _appropriate_ inode modification
operation. This is why IMHO we should protect them to avoid a lost update.
BTW the i_generation which is used by NFS and fuse filesystems is updated
even if the inode is marked immutable, is this the intended behaviour?
> Honza
Thanks for your response.
--
tixxdz
http://opendz.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-03 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-03 1:31 [PATCH] fs/ext{3,4}: fix potential race when setversion ioctl updates inode Djalal Harouni
2012-01-03 12:46 ` Jan Kara
2012-01-03 23:14 ` Djalal Harouni [this message]
2012-01-04 17:34 ` Jan Kara
2012-01-04 17:46 ` Jan Kara
2012-01-04 23:15 ` Andreas Dilger
2012-01-04 23:32 ` Jan Kara
2012-01-04 23:56 ` Andreas Dilger
2012-01-05 0:40 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-01-05 11:42 ` Jan Kara
2012-01-06 1:00 ` Djalal Harouni
2012-01-09 15:03 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120103231432.GA23522@dztty \
--to=tixxdz@opendz.org \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).