From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@oracle.com>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Coly Li <colyli@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 21/51] e2fsck: Verify extent tree blocks and clear the bad ones
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 00:35:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120107083510.25788.57961.stgit@elm3c44.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120107083256.25788.41238.stgit@elm3c44.beaverton.ibm.com>
When we encounter an extent tree block that passes the header check but fails
the checksum, offer to clear just that extent block instead of failing the
whole tree, which results in the entire inode being wiped out.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com>
---
e2fsck/pass1.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
e2fsck/problem.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
e2fsck/problem.h | 6 ++++++
3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/e2fsck/pass1.c b/e2fsck/pass1.c
index c382a7b..1ae117d 100644
--- a/e2fsck/pass1.c
+++ b/e2fsck/pass1.c
@@ -1805,6 +1805,7 @@ static void scan_extent_node(e2fsck_t ctx, struct problem_context *pctx,
int is_dir, is_leaf;
errcode_t problem;
struct ext2_extent_info info;
+ int failed_csum;
pctx->errcode = ext2fs_extent_get_info(ehandle, &info);
if (pctx->errcode)
@@ -1812,11 +1813,25 @@ static void scan_extent_node(e2fsck_t ctx, struct problem_context *pctx,
pctx->errcode = ext2fs_extent_get(ehandle, EXT2_EXTENT_FIRST_SIB,
&extent);
- while (!pctx->errcode && info.num_entries-- > 0) {
+ while ((pctx->errcode == 0 ||
+ pctx->errcode == EXT2_ET_EXTENT_CSUM_INVALID) &&
+ info.num_entries-- > 0) {
+ failed_csum = 0;
is_leaf = extent.e_flags & EXT2_EXTENT_FLAGS_LEAF;
is_dir = LINUX_S_ISDIR(pctx->inode->i_mode);
problem = 0;
+ /* Ask to clear a corrupt extent block */
+ if (pctx->errcode == EXT2_ET_EXTENT_CSUM_INVALID) {
+ pctx->blk = extent.e_pblk;
+ pctx->blk2 = extent.e_lblk;
+ pctx->num = extent.e_len;
+ problem = PR_1_EXTENT_CSUM_INVALID;
+ if (fix_problem(ctx, problem, pctx))
+ goto fix_problem_now;
+ failed_csum = 1;
+ }
+
if (extent.e_pblk == 0 ||
extent.e_pblk < ctx->fs->super->s_first_data_block ||
extent.e_pblk >= ext2fs_blocks_count(ctx->fs->super))
@@ -1828,12 +1843,24 @@ static void scan_extent_node(e2fsck_t ctx, struct problem_context *pctx,
ext2fs_blocks_count(ctx->fs->super))
problem = PR_1_EXTENT_ENDS_BEYOND;
+ /* Corrupt but passes checks? Ask to fix checksum. */
+ if (failed_csum) {
+ pctx->blk = extent.e_pblk;
+ pctx->blk2 = extent.e_lblk;
+ pctx->num = extent.e_len;
+ problem = 0;
+ if (fix_problem(ctx, PR_1_EXTENT_ONLY_CSUM_INVALID,
+ pctx))
+ ext2fs_extent_replace(ehandle, 0, &extent);
+ }
+
if (problem) {
report_problem:
pctx->blk = extent.e_pblk;
pctx->blk2 = extent.e_lblk;
pctx->num = extent.e_len;
if (fix_problem(ctx, problem, pctx)) {
+fix_problem_now:
e2fsck_read_bitmaps(ctx);
pctx->errcode =
ext2fs_extent_delete(ehandle, 0);
@@ -1860,7 +1887,10 @@ static void scan_extent_node(e2fsck_t ctx, struct problem_context *pctx,
if (pctx->errcode) {
pctx->str = "EXT2_EXTENT_DOWN";
problem = PR_1_EXTENT_HEADER_INVALID;
- if (pctx->errcode == EXT2_ET_EXTENT_HEADER_BAD)
+ if (pctx->errcode ==
+ EXT2_ET_EXTENT_HEADER_BAD ||
+ pctx->errcode ==
+ EXT2_ET_EXTENT_CSUM_INVALID)
goto report_problem;
return;
}
diff --git a/e2fsck/problem.c b/e2fsck/problem.c
index 95813ce..cd404f8 100644
--- a/e2fsck/problem.c
+++ b/e2fsck/problem.c
@@ -951,6 +951,21 @@ static struct e2fsck_problem problem_table[] = {
N_("The bad @b @i looks @n. "),
PROMPT_CLEAR, 0 },
+ /* Inode extent block checksum does not match extent */
+ { PR_1_EXTENT_CSUM_INVALID,
+ N_("@i %i extent block checksum does not match extent\n\t(logical @b "
+ "%c, @n physical @b %b, len %N)\n"),
+ PROMPT_CLEAR, 0 },
+
+ /*
+ * Inode extent block passes checks, but checksum does not match
+ * extent
+ */
+ { PR_1_EXTENT_ONLY_CSUM_INVALID,
+ N_("@i %i extent block passes checks, but checksum does not match "
+ "extent\n\t(logical @b %c, @n physical @b %b, len %N)\n"),
+ PROMPT_FIX, 0 },
+
/* Pass 1b errors */
/* Pass 1B: Rescan for duplicate/bad blocks */
diff --git a/e2fsck/problem.h b/e2fsck/problem.h
index 51a911b..cd9e4ed 100644
--- a/e2fsck/problem.h
+++ b/e2fsck/problem.h
@@ -556,6 +556,12 @@ struct problem_context {
/* inode passes checks, but checksum does not match inode */
#define PR_1_INODE_ONLY_CSUM_INVALID 0x010067
+/* extent block checksum does not match extent block */
+#define PR_1_EXTENT_CSUM_INVALID 0x010068
+
+/* extent block passes checks, but checksum does not match extent block */
+#define PR_1_EXTENT_ONLY_CSUM_INVALID 0x010069
+
/*
* Pass 1b errors
*/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-07 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-07 8:32 [PATCH v2.3 00/51] e2fsprogs: Add metadata checksumming Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:33 ` [PATCH 01/51] libext2fs: Read and write full size inodes Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:33 ` [PATCH 02/51] libext2fs: Change ext4 on-disk layout to support metadata checksumming Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:33 ` [PATCH 03/51] debugfs: Optionally ignore bad checksums Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:33 ` [PATCH 04/51] libext2fs: Precompute FS UUID checksum seed Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:33 ` [PATCH 05/51] libext2fs: Add inode checksum support Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:33 ` [PATCH 06/51] debugfs: Dump inode checksum when appropriate Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:33 ` [PATCH 07/51] tune2fs: Add inode checksum support Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:33 ` [PATCH 08/51] e2fsck: Verify and correct inode checksums Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:33 ` [PATCH 09/51] mke2fs: Allow metadata checksums to be turned on at mkfs time Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:34 ` [PATCH 10/51] libext2fs: Create the inode bitmap checksum Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:34 ` [PATCH 11/51] tune2fs: Rewrite inode bitmap checksums Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:34 ` [PATCH 12/51] dumpe2fs: Display inode bitmap checksum Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:34 ` [PATCH 13/51] e2fsck: Verify " Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:34 ` [PATCH 14/51] libext2fs: Create the block " Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:34 ` [PATCH 15/51] dumpe2fs: Display " Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:34 ` [PATCH 16/51] e2fsck: Verify " Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:34 ` [PATCH 17/51] e2fsck: Don't verify bitmap checksums Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:34 ` [PATCH 18/51] tune2fs: Rewrite block " Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:34 ` [PATCH 19/51] libext2fs: Verify and calculate extent tree block checksums Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:35 ` [PATCH 20/51] tune2fs: Enable extent tree checksums Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:35 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2012-01-07 8:35 ` [PATCH 22/51] debugfs: Print htree internal node checksums Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:35 ` [PATCH 23/51] libext2fs: Add dx_root/dx_node checksum calculation and verification helpers Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:35 ` [PATCH 24/51] e2fsck: Verify htree root/node checksums Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:35 ` [PATCH 25/51] libext2fs: Introduce dir_entry_tail to provide checksums for directory leaf nodes Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:35 ` [PATCH 26/51] e2fsck: Check directory leaf block checksums Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:35 ` [PATCH 27/51] tune2fs: Rebuild and checksum directories when toggling metadata_csum or changing UUID Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:35 ` [PATCH 28/51] libext2fs: Verify and calculate extended attribute block checksums Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:36 ` [PATCH 29/51] e2fsck: Check " Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:36 ` [PATCH 30/51] tune2fs: Rewrite " Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:36 ` [PATCH 31/51] libext2fs: Calculate and verify superblock checksums Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:36 ` [PATCH 32/51] e2fsck: Handle superblock checksum errors gracefully Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:36 ` [PATCH 33/51] libext2fs: Record the checksum algorithm in use in the superblock Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:36 ` [PATCH 34/51] tune2fs: Store checksum algorithm type in superblock Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:36 ` [PATCH 35/51] mke2fs: Record the checksum algorithm in use in the superblock Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:36 ` [PATCH 36/51] libext2fs: Block group checksum should use metadata_csum algorithm (if feature flag set) Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:36 ` [PATCH 37/51] tune2fs: Rewrite block group checksums when changing bg_use_meta_csum feature Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:36 ` [PATCH 38/51] mke2fs: Warn if not enabling all the features that metadata_csum wants Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:37 ` [PATCH 39/51] libext2fs: Add checksum to MMP block Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:37 ` [PATCH 40/51] e2fsck: Verify and correct MMP checksum problems Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:37 ` [PATCH 41/51] tune2fs: Force MMP update when changing metadata_csum flag Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:37 ` [PATCH 42/51] libext2fs: Change on-disk journal layout to support metadata checksumming Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:37 ` [PATCH 43/51] libext2fs: Dump feature flags for jbd2 v2 checksums Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:37 ` [PATCH 44/51] e2fsck: Check journal superblock checksum prior to recovery Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:37 ` [PATCH 45/51] e2fsck: Check revoke block checksum during recovery Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:37 ` [PATCH 46/51] e2fsck: Check descriptor block checksum when recovering journal Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:37 ` [PATCH 47/51] e2fsck: Check commit block checksum during recovery Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:38 ` [PATCH 48/51] e2fsck: Verify data block checksums when recovering journal Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:38 ` [PATCH 49/51] libext2fs: Enable support for the metadata checksumming feature Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:38 ` [PATCH 50/51] libext2fs: Bring the CRC32c implementation up to date with the kernel implementation Darrick J. Wong
2012-01-07 8:38 ` [PATCH 51/51] e2fsck: Refactor crc32_be code Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120107083510.25788.57961.stgit@elm3c44.beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=colyli@gmail.com \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sunil.mushran@oracle.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).