linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	Surbhi Palande <csurbhi@gmail.com>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>, Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] xfs: Move ilock before transaction start in xfs_setattr_size()
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:52:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120124115234.GD15974@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120124065945.GL15102@dastard>

On Tue 24-01-12 17:59:45, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 09:34:42PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > In xfs we first take ilock and start transaction afterwards.
> 
> The correct order is to allocate the transaction, reserve the space
> for it and then take the ilock.  We cannot hold the ilock over the
> transaction reservation because that can deadlock the journal.
>
> That is, to make space for the new transaction reservation, we may
> need to take the ilock to flush the inode and allow the journal tail
> to move forwards to make space for the new transaction.  If we
> already hold the ilock, then it can't be flushed, we can't make
> space available in the journal and hence deadlock.
  Thanks for clarification!

> Maybe you confused the ilock vs the iolock.  We can hold the iolock
> over the trans alloc/reserve because that lock is not required to
> move the tail of the journal, so the deadlock doesn't exist.
  Ups! I now had a look at what xfs_rw_ilock() does. I always thought it's
just a plain rw semaphore and now I see it takes several locks depending on
the argument. Ugh, a bit surprising for XFS newcomer as me ;) But now
things become clearer so I fix my patches with this new knowledge in mind.
So just disregard my locking comments. They were likely bogus.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-24 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-20 20:34 [PATCH 0/8] Fix filesystem freezing Jan Kara
2012-01-20 20:34 ` [PATCH 1/8] fs: Improve filesystem freezing handling Jan Kara
2012-02-04  3:03   ` Eric Sandeen
2012-02-06 15:17     ` Jan Kara
2012-01-20 20:34 ` [PATCH 2/8] vfs: Protect write paths by sb_start_write - sb_end_write Jan Kara
2012-01-24  8:21   ` Dave Chinner
2012-01-24 11:44     ` Jan Kara
2012-02-05  6:13   ` Eric Sandeen
2012-02-06 15:33     ` Jan Kara
2012-01-20 20:34 ` [PATCH 3/8] ext4: Protect ext4_page_mkwrite & ext4_setattr with " Jan Kara
2012-01-20 20:34 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs: Move ilock before transaction start in xfs_setattr_size() Jan Kara
2012-01-24  6:59   ` Dave Chinner
2012-01-24 11:52     ` Jan Kara [this message]
2012-01-20 20:34 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: Protect xfs_file_aio_write() & xfs_setattr_size() with sb_start_write - sb_end_write Jan Kara
2012-01-24  7:19   ` Dave Chinner
2012-01-24 19:35     ` Jan Kara
2012-02-04  4:30   ` Eric Sandeen
2012-02-04  4:50     ` Eric Sandeen
2012-02-05 23:11     ` Dave Chinner
2012-01-20 20:34 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: Use generic writers counter instead of m_active_trans counter Jan Kara
2012-01-24  8:05   ` Dave Chinner
2012-02-04  2:13     ` Eric Sandeen
2012-02-04  2:42   ` Eric Sandeen
2012-02-04  4:34   ` Eric Sandeen
2012-01-20 20:34 ` [PATCH 7/8] Documentation: Correct s_umount state for freeze_fs/unfreeze_fs Jan Kara
2012-01-20 20:34 ` [PATCH 8/8] vfs: Document s_frozen state through freeze_super Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120124115234.GD15974@quack.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=bpm@sgi.com \
    --cc=csurbhi@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=elder@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kamal@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).