From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Kazuya Mio <k-mio@sx.jp.nec.com>
Cc: ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext3: Update ctime in ext3_splice_branch() only when needed
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 10:33:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120208093307.GB24625@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F322585.3010407@sx.jp.nec.com>
On Wed 08-02-12 16:34:29, Kazuya Mio wrote:
> Currently ext3 updates ctime in ext3_splice_branch() which is called whenever
> we allocate one block. But it is wasteful because ext3 doesn't support
> nanosecond timestamp. This leads to a performance loss.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kazuya Mio <k-mio@sx.jp.nec.com>
Thanks. The patch looks good. I've added it to my tree.
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext3/inode.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/fs/ext3/inode.c b/fs/ext3/inode.c
> index 2d0afec..3c7fd63 100644
> --- a/fs/ext3/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext3/inode.c
> @@ -756,6 +756,7 @@ static int ext3_splice_branch(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> struct ext3_block_alloc_info *block_i;
> ext3_fsblk_t current_block;
> struct ext3_inode_info *ei = EXT3_I(inode);
> + struct timespec now;
>
> block_i = ei->i_block_alloc_info;
> /*
> @@ -795,9 +796,11 @@ static int ext3_splice_branch(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> }
>
> /* We are done with atomic stuff, now do the rest of housekeeping */
> -
> - inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC;
> - ext3_mark_inode_dirty(handle, inode);
> + now = CURRENT_TIME_SEC;
> + if (!timespec_equal(&inode->i_ctime, &now) || !where->bh) {
> + inode->i_ctime = now;
> + ext3_mark_inode_dirty(handle, inode);
> + }
> /* ext3_mark_inode_dirty already updated i_sync_tid */
> atomic_set(&ei->i_datasync_tid, handle->h_transaction->t_tid);
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-08 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-08 7:34 [PATCH v2] ext3: Update ctime in ext3_splice_branch() only when needed Kazuya Mio
2012-02-08 9:33 ` Jan Kara [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120208093307.GB24625@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=k-mio@sx.jp.nec.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).