From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ted Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] e2fsck: Discard only unused parts of inode table Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 17:22:34 -0500 Message-ID: <20120306222234.GB5472@thunk.org> References: <1330014566-2020-1-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com> <4F4D0159.1090409@sandeen.net> <4F4FB37F.60405@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Lukas Czerner , Eric Sandeen , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, psusi@ubuntu.com To: Eric Sandeen Return-path: Received: from li9-11.members.linode.com ([67.18.176.11]:58703 "EHLO test.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758895Ab2CFWWg (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Mar 2012 17:22:36 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F4FB37F.60405@redhat.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 11:35:59AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > > > So do you want me to separate those unrelated changes to a separate > > patch ? Those are pretty small changes.. > > They are, but they are completely separate fixes, and not described in the changelog. I agree with Eric; it's a lot better both for me as a maintainer, and for people who are perusing the git logs / history in the future, to have things completely separated out. - Ted