From: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Update of e2fsprogs pu branch and ext4 dev branch
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 16:20:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120502082007.GC11639@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1SObU7-0004xb-KU@tytso-glaptop.cam.corp.google.com>
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 05:16:47PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>
> I have updated the pu ("proposed updates") branch of e2fsprogs to
> include the metadata checksum and inline data patches rebased against
> the lastest changes in the e2fsprogs repository. Note that these
> patches have not been fully reviewed yet, and are still subject to
> change! In particular, the metadata checksum patches still have the
> issue with the jbd2 checksuming code breaking 64-bit block numbers, and
> inline data branches are causing a regression test failure. I've
> integrated them into the pu branch to make it easier for me to review
> and test these changes, and so that other developers can see what is
> going on.
Hi Ted,
Could you please tell me where can I find this regression test? I want
to dig why inline data branch causes it failure. Thanks.
Regards,
Zheng
>
> I also had to make some changes to the last inline data patch so that it
> would apply given the changes which the metadata checksum patch series
> had made to e2fsck/pass2.c. I am not sure I did all off those changes
> correctly, and I'd invite Darrick and Zheng to take a look at them to
> make sure I didn't really screw something up.
>
> As I've mentioned, the regression tests mostly pass, but critically
> missing from both patch series are any kind of regression tests. I
> would really appreciate it if you would consider creating some of
> those. We may find some interesting bugs as part of the test creation
> and validation process.
>
> The pu branch is a **rewinding** branch; that is to say, I will be
> periodically rebasing the patches on the pu branch to take into account
> movement in the e2fsprogs master branch. If you want to make any
> changes to the patches at this point, please fork the following patch
> queue on github, make the changes, and then (a) send the updated patch
> to the mailing list, and (b) push it to github and ask me to pull it
> from your tree. That will save me a lot of time. The github repo is
> at:
>
> git://github.com/tytso/e2fsprogs-cksum-patch-queue.git
>
> and the github page can be found at:
>
> https://github.com/tytso/e2fsprogs-cksum-patch-queue
>
> I have been using the "guilt" package to manipulate the patch tree, but
> you can also you quilt for the same purpose.
>
>
> I have also added the first half of the metadata checksum patches to the
> ext4 development tree. Again, I've not fully finished reviewing the
> patches, but they pass the regression test in the standard ext4 modes.
> I haven't had a chance to enable metadata checksuming yet, and the jbd2
> patches clearly need some revision (which is why they aren't in the ext4
> patch queue yet).
>
> The ext4 patch queue is also on github:
>
> git://github.com/tytso/ext4-patch-queue.git
> https://github.com/tytso/ext4-patch-queue/commits/master
>
> The same comment applies for updating the patches that are on the
> ext4-patch-queue. Please start with the version of the patches in this
> git tree, since I have had to make some changes so they would apply
> cleanly against the latest kernel release.
>
> There is a comment in the series file which indicates the commit ID of
> e2fsprogs/ext4 the patchsets are currently based upon. When I rebase
> the patches to take into account newer commits, I will update the commit
> ID in the series file.
>
> - Ted
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-02 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-29 21:16 Update of e2fsprogs pu branch and ext4 dev branch Theodore Ts'o
2012-04-30 16:40 ` djwong
2012-05-02 7:29 ` Zheng Liu
2012-05-02 18:40 ` Andreas Dilger
2012-05-02 8:20 ` Zheng Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120502082007.GC11639@gmail.com \
--to=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).