From: Roland Eggner <edvx1@systemanalysen.net>
To: Ludwig Nussel <ludwig.nussel@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
"open list:EXT2 FILE SYSTEM" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] implement uid and gid mount options for ext2, ext3 and ext4
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 05:49:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120511034945.GA15892@mobil.systemanalysen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1336660924-9598-1-git-send-email-ludwig.nussel@suse.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4062 bytes --]
On 2012-05-10 Thu 16:42 +0200, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> …
> When using 'real' file systems on removable storage devices such as
> hard disks or usb sticks people quickly face the problem that their
> Linux users have different uids on different machines. Therefore one
> cannot modify or even read files created on a different machine
> without running chown as root or storing everything with mode 777.
> Simple file systems such as vfat don't have that problem as they
> don't store file ownership information and one can pass the uid
> files should belong to as mount option.
>
> The following two patches (for 3.4.0-rc4) implement the uid (and
> gid) mount option for ext2, ext3 and ext4 to make them actually
> useful on removable media. If a file system is mounted with the uid
> option all files appear to be owned by the specified uid. Only newly
> created files actually end up with that uid as owner on disk though.
> Ownership of existing files cannot be changed permanently if the uid
> option was specified.
>
> Acked-by: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
> Signed-off-by: Ludwig Nussel <ludwig.nussel@suse.de>
> ---
> Documentation/filesystems/ext2.txt | 9 ++++++
> Documentation/filesystems/ext3.txt | 9 ++++++
> Documentation/filesystems/ext4.txt | 9 ++++++
> fs/ext2/ext2.h | 8 +++++
> fs/ext2/inode.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++------
> fs/ext2/super.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> fs/ext3/ext3.h | 8 +++++
> fs/ext3/inode.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> fs/ext3/super.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 4 ++
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> fs/ext4/super.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 12 files changed, 311 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> …
In short:
.........
Problem solving at its root is more efficient than at “end of pipe”.
IMHO this is an example of “end of pipe“ thinking with following downsides:
...........................................................................
* Maintainers point of view:
* Introduces new problems: Breaking holes in the access restrictions
provided by the Linux kernel at will of unprivileged users would render
the kernel unusable for reliable operation in multiuser environments.
* Adds code complexity and risk of bugs.
* Adds future maintainance load.
* Users point of view:
* Editing /etc/fstab or using mount commands with options not in
/etc/fstab require root privileges anyway, at least on sane systems.
* Adds usage complexity (new vs. old files, on disk vs. pretended UIDs …).
* Adds risk of usage errors.
IMHO the “right thing to do” is to solve the problem at its root:
.................................................................
My habit is, whenever I use {group,user}add commands:
* In advance I create a list of all current and future users (user, GID, UID)
common to all systems that might exchange files. The list is designed to
have “headroom” for future additions.
* I always consult this list and use options --gid $userGID --uid $userUID to
{group,user}add commands.
* Exchanging files with an unforeseen system is an exception, which requires
root privileges anyway,
Advantages:
* Decent migration of files to other systems via backups, external storage …
* No NEW wholes in the access restrictions provided by the Linux kernel.
* No NEW kernel code possibly introducing bugs.
* No need to learn new mount options.
* No NEW risks of usage errors.
Summary:
........
* If UIDs differ on machines FORESEEN for file exchange, this is an
administrator error, not a kernel deficit.
* File exchange with an UNFORESEEN system requires root privileges anyway.
Thanks,
Roland Eggner
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-11 3:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-10 14:42 [PATCH RESEND] implement uid and gid mount options for ext2, ext3 and ext4 Ludwig Nussel
2012-05-10 15:00 ` Jan Kara
2012-05-10 15:30 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-05-11 3:49 ` Roland Eggner [this message]
2012-05-11 15:31 ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-05-14 23:15 ` NeilBrown
2012-05-16 7:25 ` Boaz Harrosh
[not found] ` <4FAD2161.3090108@landley.net>
2012-05-11 16:46 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-05-11 17:18 ` Boaz Harrosh
[not found] ` <20120511192235.GE6467@thunk.org>
2012-05-13 11:46 ` Boaz Harrosh
[not found] ` <4FADB860.2000009@landley.net>
2012-05-13 4:24 ` Ted Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120511034945.GA15892@mobil.systemanalysen.net \
--to=edvx1@systemanalysen.net \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ludwig.nussel@suse.de \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).