linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	bfields@fieldses.org, adilger@dilger.ca, tytso@mit.edu,
	jack@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix how i_version is modified and turn it on by default V2
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 13:53:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120515175308.GB1907@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337092396-3272-1-git-send-email-josef@redhat.com>

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:33:16AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> This makes MS_I_VERSION be turned on by default.  Ext4 had been
> unconditionally doing i_version++ in a few cases anway so the mount option
> was kind of silly.  This patch also removes the update in mark_inode_dirty
> and makes all of the cases where we update ctime also do inode_inc_iversion.
> file_update_time takes care of the write case and all the places where we
> update iversion are protected by the i_mutex so there should be no extra
> i_lock overhead in the normal non-exported fs case.  Thanks,
> 

Ok did some basic benchmarking with dd, I ran

dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/btrfs-test/file bs=1 count=10485760
dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/btrfs-test/file bs=1M count=1000
dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/btrfs-test/file bs=1M count=5000

3 times with the patch and without the patch.  With the worst case scenario
there is about a 40% longer run time, going from on average 12 seconds to 17
seconds.  With the other two runs they are the same runtime with the 1 megabyte
blocks.  So the question is, do we care about this worst case since any sane
application developer isn't going to do writes that small?  Thanks,

Josef

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-15 17:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-15 14:33 [PATCH] ext4: fix how i_version is modified and turn it on by default V2 Josef Bacik
2012-05-15 15:18 ` Jan Kara
2012-05-15 17:53 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
     [not found]   ` <20120515175308.GB1907-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-15 18:17     ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-05-15 18:29       ` Josef Bacik
2012-05-15 19:55         ` Andreas Dilger
     [not found]           ` <AB91C817-DFEE-415F-8769-78831D72C6B7-m1MBpc4rdrD3fQ9qLvQP4Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-15 20:05             ` Josef Bacik
     [not found]               ` <20120515200533.GD1907-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-15 21:00                 ` J. Bruce Fields
     [not found]                   ` <20120515210029.GA11932-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-15 21:08                     ` Josef Bacik
2012-05-15 22:19                     ` Andreas Dilger
     [not found]         ` <20120515182914.GC1907-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-15 20:24           ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-05-16  1:36   ` Ted Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120515175308.GB1907@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=josef@redhat.com \
    --cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).